PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

 

e-ISSN 2231-8526
ISSN 0128-7680

Home / Regular Issue / JST Vol. 30 (1) Jan. 2022 / JST-2787-2021

 

A Dashboard-based System to Manage and Monitor the Progression of Undergraduate IT Degree Final Year Projects

Nooralisa Mohd Tuah, Ainnecia Yoag, Dinna@Nina Mohd Nizam and Cheang Wan Chin

Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, Volume 30, Issue 1, January 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.30.1.13

Keywords: Dashboard, final year project, rapid application development, technology acceptance model

Published on: 10 January 2022

Having a system to process and store information securely is crucial for an e-learning environment in a higher learning institute. Data recorded manually is deemed unsuitable as it may lead to mishandling of documents, poor record of documents movements, and even missing documents. A final year project (FYP) subject for a particular university’s course would need a specific management system to alleviate the work processes of supervision and monitor student progress. This system would reduce cost, paperwork, staffing and even simplify the workflow process. Therefore, introducing a student dashboard-based system for the FYP course is proposed in this study. This paper presents a smart system utilizing data analytics and a dashboard that enables the students to self-monitor, track progress and manage important information related to their FYP. The system development followed stepwise Rapid Application Development (RAD) methodology in developing the system. The developed system has been designed, developed, and tested by university students taking FYP courses. A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was adopted in the testing phase to examine the system acceptance and user behavior intention in using the proposed system. The results showed a significant effect on a positive implementation in the faculty’s course management and monitoring the student’s FYP progress. For the dashboard-based system to reach its full potential, it is highly recommended to implement the system in its course management fully.

  • Abdulkareem, A., Adewale, A. A., & Dike, I. U. (2013). Design and development of a university portal for the management of final year undergraduate projects. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 2(10), 2911-2920.

  • Ahmad, W. N. W., Rodzuan, A. R. A., Teong, K. V, Jamil, N., & Tuah, N. M. (2019). E-community program: A study on ICT knowledge transfer to Labuan community. In H. B. Zaman, A. F. Smeaton, T. K. Shih, S. Velastin, T. Terutoshi, N. M. Ali & M. N. Ahmad (Eds.), IVIC: International Visual Informatics Conference (pp. 729-740). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34032-2_65

  • Aljohani, N. R., Daud, A., Abbasi, R. A., Alowibdi, J. S., Basheri, M., & Aslam, M. A. (2019). An integrated framework for course adapted student learning analytics dashboard. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 679-690. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.035

  • Asli, M. F., Hamzah, M., Ibrahim, A. A. A., & Embug, A. J. (2019). Visual analytics: Design study for exploratory analytics on peer profiles, activity and learning performance for MOOC forum activity assessment. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(1), 66-72. http://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.1.7542.

  • Buhari, A., Valloo, S., & Hashim, H. (2017). A Streamlined approach to enhance the capacity of undergraduate IT students to deliver high quality and demand-driven final year project: A conceptual framework on collaboration between industry and university. In Proceedings of 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF) (pp. 910-914). IEEE Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467126

  • Chik, R., & Rafi’i, M. (2016). Interactive evaluation system for final year project (FYP). In Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICICTM) (pp. 203-208). IEEE Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICICTM.2016.7890801

  • Gutiérrez, F., Seipp, K., Ochoa, X., Chiluiza, K., De Laet, T., & Verbert, K. (2020). LADA: A learning analytics dashboard for academic advising. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, Article 105826. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.004

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 923-938. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9477-y

  • Ismail, S. I., Abdullah, R., Kar, S. A. C., Fadzal, N., Husni, H., & Omar, H. M. (2017). Online project evaluation and supervision system (oPENs) for final year project proposal development process. In Proceeding of the IEEE 15th Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) (pp. 210-214). IEEE Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2017.8305392

  • Kar, S. A., Fadzal, N., Ismail, S. I., Abdullah, R., & Omar, H. M. (2017). Integrated supervision and evaluation system for final year project. In Proceeding of the IEEE 15th Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) (pp. 198-203). IEEE Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2017.8305394.

  • Khamaruddin, P. F. M., Sauki, A., Othman, N. H., & Kadri, A. (2017). Using moodle as an integrated final year project management system. In Proceeding of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 238-242). IEEE Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251200.

  • Kim, J., Jo, I. H., & Park, Y. (2016). Effects of learning analytics dashboard: Analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 13-24. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9403-8

  • Klašnja-Milićević, A., & Ivanović, M. (2018). Learning analytics - New flavor and benefits for educational environments. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 285-300. http://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.15

  • Leitner, P., Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education - A literature review. In A. Pena-Ayala (Ed.), Learning analytics: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 1-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_1

  • Leung, C., Lai, C., Yuan, T., Pang, W., Tang, J. K., Ho, W., & Wong, T. (2015). The development of a final year project management system for information technology programmes. In K. C. Li, T. L. Wong, S. K. S. Cheung, J. Lam & K. K. Ng (Eds.), Technology in education. Transforming educational practices with technology (pp. 86-97). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46158-7_9

  • Mehmet, K., & Arif, A. (2021). Effects of learner interaction with learning dashboards on academic performance in an e-learning environment. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(2), 161-175.

  • Mohamed, M. A., Abidin, A., Jamal, A. A., Amin, M., Rozaimee, A., & Wahab, F. A. (2017). An implementation of final year project management system: A case study at Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin. World Applied Sciences Journal, 35(8), 1246-1251.

  • Revythi, A., & Tselios, N. (2019). Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2341-2355. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09869-4

  • Roberts, L. D., Howell, J. A., & Seaman, K. (2017). Give me a customizable dashboard: Personalized learning analytics dashboards in higher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 317-333. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9316-1

  • Safsouf, Y., Mansouri, K., & Poirier, F. (2021). Experimental design of learning analysis dashboards for teachers and learners. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 347-350). ACM Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1145/3430895.3460990

  • Sarikaya, A., Correll, M., Bartram, L., Tory, M., & Fisher, D. (2019). What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1), 682-692. http://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864903

  • Sønderlund, A. L., Hughes, E., & Smith, J. (2019). The efficacy of learning analytics interventions in higher education: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2594-2618. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12720

  • Szynkiewicz, J., Munkvold, R. I., & Kolas, L. (2020). Progression of tool usage in project-based IT courses. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference (Vol. 2020-Octob, pp. 1-5). IEEE Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274171

  • To, W. M., & Tang, M. N. F. (2019). Computer-based course evaluation: An extended technology acceptance model. Educational Studies, 45(2), 131-144. http://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1443797

  • Tsai, Y. S., Rates, D., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Kloos, C. D., & Gašević, D. (2020). Learning analytics in European higher education - Trends and barriers. Computers and Education, 155, Article 103933. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933

  • Vakaloudis, A., Cahill, B., O’Leary, C., & Challa, D. (2020). Preparation and execution of final year student projects on the cloud. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273971

ISSN 0128-7680

e-ISSN 2231-8526

Article ID

JST-2787-2021

Download Full Article PDF

Share this article

Recent Articles