e-ISSN 2231-8526
ISSN 0128-7680
Siddalingappa Parameshappa Kodigaddi, Srikanth Holalu Venkataramana, Kapilan Natesan and Norkhairunnisa Mazlan
Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, Volume 33, Issue 1, January 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.33.1.09
Keywords: Additive manufacturing, aerodynamics, morphing wing, structural analysis, thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Published on: 23 January 2025
Camber-morphing wing technology enables adaptive adjustments to wing curvature by optimizing aerodynamic performance and efficiency for varying flight conditions. This study emphasizes the novel Trailing Edge Morphing Airfoil (TEMA) design and analysis, showcasing its noteworthy aerodynamic characteristics. The design uses the parabolic morphing method to obtain TEMA profiles for deflection angles. The different shapes of the TEMA and base airfoil were analyzed using the XFOIL solver with a linear-vorticity stream function formulation. TEMA with a flexible zigzag section was developed using a 3D printing technique with TPU material. The rectangular wing model was developed using TEMA and tested in a low-speed subsonic wind tunnel with Reynolds numbers of 1.19 ×105, 2.54 × 105 and 3.18 x 105 for different angles of attack. The test cases had a combination of different Reynolds numbers, deflection angles, and angles of attack. The aerodynamic characteristics were calculated by measuring the pressure coefficient around the TEMA using an advanced pressure scanner. The results show that TEMA with a moderate deflection angle has the potential to improve the lift-to-drag ratios by around 30%. It was concluded that TEMA with +5° and +10° deflection angles demonstrated superior aerodynamic efficiency at the Reynolds numbers mentioned compared to the conventional NACA 2412 airfoil.
Açıkel, H. H., & Genç, M. S. (2018). Control of laminar separation bubble over wind turbine airfoil using partial flexibility on suction surface. Energy, 165, 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.040
Ajaj, R. M., Flores, E. S., Friswell, M. I., Allegri, G., Woods, B. K. S., Isikveren, A. T., & Dettmer, W. G. (2013). The Zigzag wingbox for a span morphing wing. Aerospace Science and Technology, 28(1), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2012.12.002
Amini, Y., Emdad, H., & Farid, M. (2015). Adjoint shape optimization of airfoils with attached Gurney flap. Aerospace Science and Technology, 41, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.12.023
Andersen, G. R., Cowan, D. L., & Piatak, D. J. (2007, April 23-26). Aeroelastic modeling, analysis and testing of a morphing wing structure. [Paper presentation]. 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-1734
Auteri, F., Savino, A., Zanotti, A., Gibertini, G., Zagaglia, D., Bmegaptche Tekap, Y., & Braza, M. (2022). Experimental evaluation of the aerodynamic performance of a large-scale high-lift morphing wing. Aerospace Science and Technology, 124, Article 107515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107515
Bai, J. B., Chen, D., Xiong, J. J., & Shenoi, R. A. (2017). A corrugated flexible composite skin for morphing applications. Composites Part B: Engineering, 131, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.056
Burdette, D. A., & Martins, J. R. R. A. (2019). Impact of morphing trailing edges on mission performance for the common research model. Journal of Aircraft, 56(1), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034967
Carneiro, P. M. C., & Gamboa, P. (2019). Structural analysis of wing ribs obtained by additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 25(4), 708–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2018-0044
Chang, L., Shen, X., Dai, Y., Wang, T., & Zhang, L. (2020). Investigation on the mechanical properties of topologically optimized cellular structures for sandwiched morphing skins. Composite Structures, 250, Article 112555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112555
Cumming, S. B., Smith, M. S., Ali, A. N., Bui, T. T., Ellsworth, J. C., & Garcia, C. A. (2016). Aerodynamic flight-test results for the adaptive compliant trailing edge. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, 2016, Article 3855. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3855
Dexl, F., Hauffe, A., & Wolf, K. (2022). Comparison of structural parameterization methods for the multidisciplinary optimization of active morphing wing sections. Computers and Structures, 263, Article 106743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106743
Drela, M. (1989). XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low reynolds number airfoils. In T. J. Mueller (Ed.), Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics (pp. 1-12). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1
Ferede, E., & Gandhi, F. (2020). Design, fabrication and testing of an active camber rotor blade tip. AIAA SciTech 2020, Article 1766. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1766
Genç, M. S., Açıkel, H. H., & Koca, K. (2020). Effect of partial flexibility over both upper and lower surfaces to flow over wind turbine airfoil. Energy Conversion and Management, 219, Article 113042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113042
Genç, M. S., Kaynak, Ü., & Yapici, H. (2011). Performance of transition model for predicting low Re aerofoil flows without/with single and simultaneous blowing and suction. European Journal of Mechanics, B/Fluids, 30(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2010.11.001
Guerrero, J. E. (2009). Effect of cambering on the aerodynamic performance of heaving airfoils. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 6(4), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60134-1
Hunsaker, D. F., Reid, J. T., & Joo, J. J. (2019). Geometric definition and ideal aerodynamic performance of parabolic trailing-edge flaps. International Journal of Astronautics and Aeronautical Engineering, 4(1), Article 199115235. https://doi.org/10.35840/2631-5009/7526
Kan, Z., Li, D., Xiang, J., & Cheng, C. (2020). Delaying stall of morphing wing by periodic trailing-edge deflection. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 33(2), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.028
Karasu, I., Özden, M., & Genç, M. S. (2018). Performance assessment of transition models for three-dimensional flow over NACA4412 wings at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 140(12), Article 121102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040228
Kaul, U. K., & Nguyen, N. T. (2015, June 22-26). A 3-D computational study of a variable camber continuous trailing edge flap (VCCTEF) spanwise segment. [Paper presentation]. 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Dallas, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-2422
Koca, K., Genç, M. S., & Ertürk, S. (2022). Impact of local flexible membrane on power efficiency stability at wind turbine blade. Renewable Energy, 197, 1163–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.038
Liu, W., Li, H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Elastic properties of a cellular structure with in-plane corrugated cosine beams. Composite Structures, 180, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.022
Liu, W., Zhu, H., Zhou, S., Bai, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhao, C. (2013). In-plane corrugated cosine honeycomb for 1D morphing skin and its application on variable camber wing. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 26(4), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2013.04.015
Mohammadi, H., Ziaei-Rad, S., & Dayyani, I. (2015). An equivalent model for trapezoidal corrugated cores based on homogenization method. Composite Structures, 131, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.048
Morgado, J., Vizinho, R., Silvestre, M. A. R., & Páscoa, J. C. (2016). XFOIL vs CFD performance predictions for high lift low Reynolds number airfoils. Aerospace Science and Technology, 52, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.02.031
Özkan, R., & Genç, M. S. (2023). Aerodynamic design and optimization of a small-scale wind turbine blade using a novel artificial bee colony algorithm based on blade element momentum (ABC-BEM) theory. Energy Conversion and Management, 283, Article 116937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116937
Pecora, R. (2021). Morphing wing flaps for large civil aircraft: Evolution of a smart technology across the Clean Sky program. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 34(7), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.004
Shen, Y., Chen, M., & Skelton, R. E. (2023). Markov data-based reference tracking control to tensegrity morphing airfoils. Engineering Structures, 291, Article 116430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116430
Siddalingappa, P. K., Badardinni, R., Hosur, S., & Manvi, P. (2022). The effect of deflection angle on aerodynamic characteristics of morphing trailing edge airfoil at low speed. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2615(1), Article 030003. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0116412
Tsushima, N., Yokozeki, T., Su, W., & Arizono, H. (2019). Geometrically nonlinear static aeroelastic analysis of composite morphing wing with corrugated structures. Aerospace Science and Technology, 88, 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.025
Woods, B. K. S., Parsons, L., Coles, A. B., Fincham, J. H. S., & Friswell, M. I. (2016). Morphing elastically lofted transition for active camber control surfaces. Aerospace Science and Technology, 55, 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.017
Yang, Y., Wang, Z., & Lyu, S. (2021). Comparative study of two lay-up sequence dispositions for flexible skin design of morphing leading edge. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 34(7), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.03.035
Yu, A., Xi, F., Moosavian, A., & Li, B. (2018). Design of a sliding morphing skin with segmented rigid panels. Journal of Aircraft, 55(5), 1985–1994. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034711
ISSN 0128-7680
e-ISSN 2231-8526