PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Over the years, the world population has been growing exponentially. This population growth affects the number of waste products due to the increased production, which leads to greater environmental impact and other problems. There are different numbers of product end-of-life (EOL) options to handle waste based on product characteristics. This research is designed to develop a methodology to determine the best EOL option for a paper product using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). AHP is one of the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods employed to select the best option by considering the user’s preferences and output of competing EOL options related to different product criteria. A graphical user interface (GUI) called AHP-based software was developed using Microsoft Excel through the programming function of Visual Basic for Applications as a user facilitating tool when conducting the analysis. The case study technique is applied to five different types of paper products to assess the capability of the proposed AHP-based software. Results from the AHP-based software reveal that recycling is the most suitable EOL technique for most paper products compared to other techniques. However, polluted products with ink or food waste and coating may not be suitable for this method. The research assists the users to identify the most sustainable ways to handle paper product waste based on the product condition.

• Abadi, S., Huda, M., Basiron, B., Ihwani, S. S., Jasmi, K. A., Hehsan, A., Safar, J., Mohamed, A. K., Embong, W. H. W., Mohamad, A. M., Noor, S. S. M., Novita, D., Maseleno, A., Irviani, R., Idris, M., & Muslihudin, M. (2018). Implementation of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process on notebook selection. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 238-243. https://doi.org/10.14419/IJET.V7I2.27.12047

• Achillas, C., Moussiopoulos, N., Karagiannidis, A., Banias, G., & Perkoulidis, G. (2013). The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: A literature review. Waste Management & Research, 31(2), 115-129.

• Ahmad, S., Wong, K. Y., Tseng, M. L., & Wong, W. P. (2018). Sustainable product design and development: A review of tools, applications and research prospects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.020

• Ahmadi, M. (2017). Evaluating the performance of 3Rs waste practices: Case study-region one municipality of Tehran. Advances in Recycling and Waste Management, 2(130), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2475-7675.1000130

• Ahmed, S., Ahmed, S., Shumon, M. R. H., Falatoonitoosi, E., & Quader, M. A. (2016). A comparative decision-making model for sustainable end-of-life vehicle management alternative selection using AHP and extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1062814

• Almanaseer, N., Abbassi, B., Dunlop, C., Friesen, K., & Nestico-Semianiw, E. (2020). Multi-criteria analysis of waste-to-energy technologies in developed and developing countries. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 76(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.76.1.25254

• Arifin, M. H., Kayode, J. S., Ismail, M. K. I., Abdullah, A. M., Embrandiri, A., Nazer, N. S. M., & Azmi, A. (2021). Environmental hazard assessment of industrial and municipal waste materials with the applications of RES2-D method and 3-D Oasis Montaj modeling: A case study at Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Peninsula Malaysia. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 406, Article 124282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124282

• Arıkan, E., Şimşit-Kalender, Z. T., & Vayvay, Ö. (2017). Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.054

• Assi, A., Bilo, F., Zanoletti, A., Ponti, J., Valsesia, A., La Spina, R., Zacco, A., & Bontempi, E. (2020). Zero-waste approach in municipal solid waste incineration: Reuse of bottom ash to stabilize fly ash. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, Article 118779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118779

• Badgie, D., Samah, M. A. A., Manaf, L. A., & Muda, A. (2012). Assessment of municipal solid waste composition in Malaysia: Management, practice, and challenges. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 21(3), 539-547.

• Badi, I., Abdulshahed, A., Shetwan, A., & Eltayeb, W. (2019). Evaluation of solid waste treatment methods in Libya by using the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(2), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1902038b

• Büyüközkan, G., & Gocer, F. (2017). An intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM approach for effective hazardous waste management. In Intelligence systems in environmental management: Theory and applications (pp. 21-40). Springer.

• Coban, A., Ertis, I. F., & Cavdaroglu, N. A. (2018). Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.130

• Coelho, L. M. G., Lange, L. C., & Coelho, H. M. (2017). Multi-criteria decision making to support waste management: A critical review of current practices and methods. Waste Management & Research, 35(1), 3-28.

• Colapinto, C., Jayaraman, R., Abdelaziz, F. B., & La Torre, D. (2019). Environmental sustainability and multifaceted development: Multi-criteria decision models with applications. Annals of Operations Research, 293, 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03403-y

• Commission, E. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Waste Framework Directive). European Commission.

• Das, S., Lee, S. H., Kumar, P., Kim, K. H., Lee, S. S., & Bhattacharya, S. S. (2019). Solid waste management: Scope and the challenge of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 658-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.323

• Dong, J., Tang, Y., Nzihou, A., Chi, Y., Weiss-Hortala, E., Ni, M., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Comparison of waste-to-energy technologies of gasification and incineration using life cycle assessment: Case studies in Finland, France and China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.139

• Dos Santos, P. H., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., Oliveira, C. H. d., & Carvalho, H. D. (2019). The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270

• Gehin, A., Zwolinski, P., & Brissaud, D. (2008). A tool to implement sustainable end-of-life strategies in the product development phase. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), 566-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.012

• Ghazalli, Z., & Murata, A. (2011). Development of an AHP-CBR evaluation system for remanufacturing: End-of-life selection strategy. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(01), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2010.528848

• Ibrahim, T. N. T., Mahmood, N. Z., & Othman, F. (2017). Estimation of leachate generation from MSW landfills in Selangor. Environmental Science, 19(1), 43-48.

• Ismail, H., & Hanafiah, M. M. (2017). Management of end-of-life electrical and electronic products: The challenges and the potential solutions for management enhancement in developing countries context. Acta Scientifica Malaysia (ASM), 1(2), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.26480/asm.02.2017.05.08

• Jayaraman, K., Vejayon, S., Raman, S., & Mostafiz, I. (2019). The proposed e-waste management model from the conviction of individual laptop disposal practices-An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 688-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.125

• Jereme, I. A., Alam, M. M., & Siwar, C. (2015). Waste recycling in Malaysia: Transition from developing to developed country. Indian Journal of Education and Information Management, 4(1), 1-14.

• Jiran, N. S., Gholami, H., Mahmood, S., Mat Saman, M. Z., Yusof, N. M., Draskovic, V., & Jovovic, R. (2019). Application of activity-based costing in estimating the costs of manufacturing process. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18(2B), 839-860.

• Joshi, G., Naithani, S., Varshney, V. K., Bisht, S. S., & Rana, V. (2017). Potential use of waste paper for the synthesis of cyanoethyl cellulose: A cleaner production approach towards sustainable environment management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3759-3768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.089

• Kalana, J. A. (2010). Electrical and electronic waste management practice by households in Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(2), 63-75.

• Kathirvale, S., Yunus, M. N. M., Sopian, K., & Samsuddin, A. H. (2004). Energy potential from municipal solid waste in Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 29(4), 559-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2003.09.003

• Kharat, M. G., Murthy, S., Kamble, S. J., Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., & Kharat, M. G. (2019). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis for environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection. Technology in Society, 57, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.005

• Kumar, A., & Samadder, S. R. (2017). A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. Waste Management, 69, 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.046

• Lim, R. (2018, September 9). Green way to manage waste. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/09/09/green-ways-to-manage-wasteswcorp-goes-for-green-technology-and-educating-the-young/.

• Liu, C., Hotta, Y., & Totoki, Y. (2017). State of 3Rs in Asia and the Pacific country report: Malaysia. United Nations Centre for Regional Development

• Mah, C. M., Fujiwara, T., & Ho, C. S. (2018). Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing toward eco-efficiency concrete waste management in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3415-3427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.200

• Mahmood, S., Hardan, M. N., Samat, M. K., Jiran, N. S., & Shaari, M. F. (2019). Ergonomic posture assessment of butchers: A small enterprise study in malaysia food industry. Jurnal Teknologi, 81(6), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.11113/JT.V81.13615

• Mamat, T. N. A., Saman, M. Z. M., Sharif, S., Simic, V., & Wahab, D. A. (2018). Development of a performance evaluation tool for end-of-life vehicle management system implementation using the analytic hierarchy process. Waste Management & Research, 36(12), 1210-1222.

• Manaf, L. A., Samah, M. A. A., & Zukki, N. I. M. (2009). Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: Practices and challenges. Waste Management, 29(11), 2902-2906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.015

• Matsakas, L., Gao, Q., Jansson, S., Rova, U., & Christakopoulos, P. (2017). Green conversion of municipal solid wastes into fuels and chemicals. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 26, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.01.004

• Moh, Y., & Manaf, L. A. (2017). Solid waste management transformation and future challenges of source separation and recycling practice in Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 116, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.012

• Nation, U. (2019). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019. United Nations.

• Ongondo, F. O., Williams, I. D., & Cherrett, T. J. (2011). How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Management, 31(4), 714-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.023

• Qazi, W. A., Abushammala, M. F., & Azam, M. H. (2018). Multi-criteria decision analysis of waste-to-energy technologies for municipal solid waste management in Sultanate of Oman. Waste Management & Research, 36(7), 594-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18777800

• Rahman, N. I. A., Khoiry, M. A., Rahim, S., & Basri, N. E. A. (2020). Review on current municipal solid waste management in Malaysia. International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 11(1), 2229-2242.

• Randazzo, L., Cusumano, A., Oliveri, G., Di Stefano, P., Renda, P., Perricone, M., & Zarcone, G. (2018). Landfill site selection for municipal solid waste by using AHP method in GIS environment: Waste management decision-support in Sicily (Italy). Detritus, 2(1), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2018.13656

• Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

• Samad, N. A. F. A., Jamin, N. A., & Saleh, S. (2017). Torrefaction of municipal solid waste in Malaysia. Energy Procedia, 138, 313-318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.106

• Saraiva, A. B., Pacheco, E. B., Gomes, G. M., Visconte, L. L., Bernardo, C., Simões, C. L., & Soares, A. G. (2016). Comparative lifecycle assessment of mango packaging made from a polyethylene/natural fiber-composite and from cardboard material. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1168-1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.135

• Sarigiannis, D. A., Handakas, E. J., Karakitsios, S. P., & Gotti, A. (2021). Life cycle assessment of municipal waste management options. Environmental Research, 193, Article 110307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110307

• Schwenk, W. S., Donovan, T. M., Keeton, W. S., & Nunery, J. S. (2012). Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: Comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Applications, 22(5), 1612-1627.

• Sekhon, P. S., & Karthigesu, I. T. (2017). Awareness on health and safety among municipal workers on solid waste collections: A case study in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 9, 19-27.

• Subramanian, N., & Ramanathan, R. (2012). A review of applications of analytic hierarchy process in operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 215-241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036

• T’ing, L. C., Moorthy, K., Mei, C. Y., Yin, F. P., Ying, W. Z., Khong, C. W., Chern, G. Z., & Lin, T. Z. (2020). Determinants of 3Rs behaviour in plastic usage: A study among Malaysians. Heliyon, 6(12), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05805

• Torkayesh, A. E., Malmir, B., & Asadabadi, M. R. (2021). Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Waste Management, 122, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.040

• Torkayesh, S. E., Amiri, A., Iranizad, A., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2020). Entropy based EDAS decision making model for neighborhood selection: A case study in istanbul. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Decision Making, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.31181/jiedm200101001t

• van Ewijk, S., Stegemann, J. A., & Ekins, P. (2017). Global life cycle paper flows, recycling metrics, and material efficiency. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(4), 686-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12613

• Vlachokostas, C., Michailidou, A. V., & Achillas, C. (2021). Multi-criteria decision analysis towards promoting waste-to-energy management strategies: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, Article 110563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110563

• Vukoje, M., & Rožić, M. (2018). Various valorisation routes of paper intended for recycling - A Review. Cellulose Chemicstry and Technology, 52(7-8), 515-541.

• Wong, Y. C., Al-Obaidi, K. M., & Mahyuddin, N. (2018). Recycling of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) for building products: Concept of processing framework from automotive to construction industries in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.145

• Yadav, V., Kalbar, P. P., Karmakar, S., & Dikshit, A. (2020). A two-stage multi-attribute decision-making model for selecting appropriate locations of waste transfer stations in urban centers. Waste Management, 114, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.024

• Zainu, Z. A., & Songip, A. R. (2017). Policies, challenges and strategies for municipal waste management in Malaysia. Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 3(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.11113/jostip.v3n1.18