PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

 

e-ISSN 2231-8534
ISSN 0128-7702

Home / Regular Issue / JSSH Vol. 32 (1) Mar. 2024 / JSSH-8791-2022

 

Prosedur Analisis ATLAS.ti Bersistematik: Pembinaan Kata Kunci Utama Soalan Karangan Bahasa Melayu SPM

Mohd Sufian Ismail, Anida Sarudin and Mohd Hafiz Mohamad Tarmizi

Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, Volume 32, Issue 1, March 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.1.03

Keywords: ATLAS.ti 24, kata kunci utama, model NCT, PICo, soalan karangan bahasa Melayu, SPM

Published on: 19 March 2024

Perisian ATLAS.ti 24 mampu diaplikasikan bagi menganalisis koleksi data secara sistematik. Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menganalisis soalan karangan Bahasa Melayu Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) bagi pembinaan kata kunci utama. Data kajian menggunakan soalan karangan Bahasa Melayu SPM sebenar, soalan karangan Bahasa Melayu SPM ulangan dan soalan karangan Bahasa Melayu SPM percubaan dari tahun 2010 hingga tahun 2020. Prosedur Model NCT Friese yang terdiri daripada komponen Noticing things, Collecting things dan Thinking about things diaplikasikan bersama tujuh fasa Thematic Content Analysis (TCA) Friese bagi memperincikan proses analisis. Alat Pembinaan Soalan Kajian (RQDT), iaitu PICo yang mewakili Populasi, Minat dan Konteks diadaptasi sebagai asas pembinaan tema dalam analisis menggunakan perisian ATLAS.ti 24. Berdasarkan penyelidikan ini, satu prosedur analisis ATLAS.ti bersistematik dibina. Selain itu, soalan karangan SPM dapat dikategorikan kepada empat aspek utama dengan satu tambahan kategori ‘Bentuk’ menjadi PICoB. Selain itu, terdapat enam kata kunci utama yang mewakili tema ‘Populasi’, tiga kata kunci utama yang mewakili tema ‘Fokus’ dan 19 kata kunci utama yang mewakili tema ‘Konteks’. Perkongsian prosedur analisis ini memberi panduan kepada penyelidik seterusnya untuk penambahbaikan analisis menggunakan perisian ATLAS.ti. Hasil penyelidikan ini juga diharapkan mampu menjana inovasi guru-guru dalam proses menganalisis sesuatu bahan serta membantu penulisan karangan pelajar agar fokus kepada kehendak soalan.

  • Bakar, A. Z. A., Ganesan, L., Othman, M., Haron, S. A., & Ishak, F. A. C. (2020). Where to Eat: Exploring silver consumer restaurant dining choice in malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(4), 3297–3317. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.28.4.44

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

  • Colas-Bravo, P., Conde-Jimenez, J., & Reyes-de-Cozar, S. (2021). Sustainability and digital teaching competence in higher education. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212354

  • Desai, S., McGrath, C., McNeil, H., Sveistrup, H., McMurray, J., & Astell, A. (2022). Experiential value of technologies: A qualitative study with older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042235

  • Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://pdfcoffee.com/qdownload/qualitative-data-analysis-with-susanne-friesepdf-pdf-free.html

  • Friese, S., Soratto, J., & Pires, D. (2018). Carrying out a computer-aided thematic content analysis with ATLAS.ti (MMG Working Papers 18-02). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324720405_Carrying_out_a_computer-aided_thematic_content_analysis_with_ATLASti

  • Friese, S. (2022). Preface ATLAS.ti 22 user manual. https://doc.atlasti.com/ManualMac.v22/ATLAS.ti_ManualMac.v22.pdf

  • Gunaseraran, G. N. A. (2017). Meningkatkan kemahiran memodifikasikan karangan jenis keperihalan kepada laporan menggunakan teknik penjelmaan [Improve the skill of modifying the type of description to report using transformation techniques]. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 1(1), 1107–1120. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.654

  • Hecker, J., & Kalpokas, N. (2022). The ultimate guide to qualitative research-Part 2: Handling qualitative data. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/data-analysis-steps#step-2-preparing-the-data

  • Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation. qualitative health research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344.

  • Hill, E., Claessen, M., Whitworth, A., Boyes, M., & Ward, R. (2018). Discourse and cognition in speakers with acquired brain injury (ABI): A systematic review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 53(4), 689–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12394

  • Ismail, M. S. (2015). Analisis struktur dan bentuk ayat dalam karangan murid tingkatan empat Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Labuan [Analysis of the structure and form of sentences in the essays of fourth grade students at Labuan National High School] [Tesis Sarjana tidak diterbitkan]. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

  • Ismail, M. S., Sarudin, A., Che Mat, A., & Nordin, F. N. (2022). Keunikan partikel ‘lah’ dalam terjemahan Surah Yasin di Malaysia [The uniqueness of the particle ‘lah’ in the translation of Surah Yasin in Malaysia]. Muallim Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/210

  • Ismail, M. S., & Sarudin, A. (2022). Analisis kata kunci dalam soalan karangan Bahasa Melayu Peringkat Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) dengan menggunakan perisian ATLAS.ti 9 [Key word analysis in Malay language essay questions at the Malaysian Certificate of Education (SPM) level using ATLAS.ti 9 software]. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera Dan Budaya, 1(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2022.1.8

  • Ismail, M. S., & Sarudin, A. (2023). Sorotan literatur bersistematik: Interpretasi partikel wacana “lah” dalam ujaran masyarakat Malaysia [Systematic literature review: Interpretation of “lah” discourse particles in Malaysian speech]. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 23(1), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2301-14

  • Jalil, A. G. (2016). Tingkah laku dan proses semasa menulis karangan respons terbuka murid berprestasi rendah [Behavior and process when writing open-response essays of low-achieving students]. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 1(1), 951–958. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.637

  • Johnson, B. T., & Hennessy, E. A. (2019). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses. Social Science & Medicine, 233, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.035

  • Johnson, E. C., Horwood, J., & Gooberman-Hill, R. (2014). Conceptualising time before surgery: The experience of patients waiting for hip replacement. Social Science and Medicine, 116(6), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.037

  • Kim, S. (2016). A comparative study of early childhood curriculum documents focused on education for sustainability in South Korea and Australia (Master’s thesis, Queensland University of Technology). QUT ePrints. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/94087/1/Soyoung_Kim_Thesis.pdf

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publication. https://books.google.com.my/books/about/Content_Analysis.html?id=q657o3M3C8cC&redir_esc=y

  • Linares-Espinos, E., Hernandez, V., Domínguez-Escrig, J. L., Fernandez-Pello, S., Hevia, V., Mayor, J., Padilla-Fernandez, B., & Ribal, M. J. (2018). Methodology of a systematic review, 42(8), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2018.07.002

  • Mokhtar, M. M., & Jamil, M. (2020). Penggunaan kata-kata hikmat, tokoh dan peribahasa dalam proses penulisan karangan argumentatif : Strategi penguasaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam kalangan murid [The use of words of wisdom, figures and proverbs in the process of writing an argumentative essay: Strategies for the mastery of high-level thinking skills among students]. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 10(1), 58–64. http://www.gjat.my/gjat2020vol10/8.pdf

  • Niebuhr, V., Niebuhr, B., Rudnicki, A., & Urbani, M. J. (2018). Technology courage: Implications for faculty development. MedEdPublish, 7(3), 144. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000144.1

  • Othman, Y., & Suzanawaty, D. (2014). Keupayaan menguasai kemahiran menulis melalui pembelajaran berasaskan projek dalam penulisan berbentuk risalah di sekolah rendah. [The ability to master writing skills through project-based learning in pamphlet writing in primary school]. Malay Language Education Journal, 4(5), 19–29.

  • Putri, R. A., Sartini, N. W., & al Fajri, M. S. (2020). The analysis of illocutionary acts of judges’ comments in America’s next top model and Asia’s next top model competitions: A cross-cultural pragmatic study. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 16(4), 1885–1898. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.851015

  • Paulus, T., Woods, M., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2017). The discourse of QDAS: Reporting practices of ATLAS.ti and NVivo users with implications for best practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1102454

  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Starting the review:Refining the question and defining the boundaries. Dalam M. Petticrew & H. Roberts (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (p. 44). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

  • Rambaree, K. (2014). Three methods of qualitative data analysis using Atlas.Ti: ‘A Posse Ad Esse’. Dalam S. Friese & T. G. Ringmayr (Eds.), Proceedings of the International ATLAS.Ti Conference. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-4840

  • Redzwan, M. H. F., Bahari, K. A., Sarudin, A., & Osman, Z. (2020). Strategi pengukuran upaya berbahasa menerusi kesantunan berbahasa sebagai indikator profesionalisme guru pelatih berasaskan skala morfofonetik, sosiolinguistik dan sosiopragmatik [Language ability measurement strategy through language politeness as an indicator of trainee teacher professionalism based on morphophonetic, sociolinguistic and sociopragmatic scales]. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 213–254. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.9

  • Saad, N. S. M., Yunus, M. M., & Embi, M. A. (2014). The successes and challenges in English language learning experiences of postgraduate international students in Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p206

  • Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE. https://z-lib.io/book/13736591

  • Savolainen, O., Turunen, H., & Sormunen, M. (2021). Municipal strategies and meeting minutes’ descriptions of the promotion of children’s mental health: A document analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 49(5), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494820961902

  • Shaffril, M. H. A., Ahmad, N., Samsuddin, S. F., Samah, A. A., & Hamdan, M. E. (2020). Systematic literature review on adaptation towards climate change impacts among indigenous people in the Asia Pacific regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, Article 120595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120595

  • Shaffril, M. H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6

  • Soratto, J., Pires, D. E. P. de, & Friese, S. (2020). Thematic content analysis using ATLAS.ti software: Potentialities for researchs in health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73(3), Article e20190250. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0250

  • Tawfik, G. M., Dila, K. A. S., Mohamed, M. Y. F., Tam, D. N. H., Kien, N. D., Ahmed, A. M., & Huy, N. T. (2019). A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical Medicine and Health, 47(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6

  • Vila-Henninger, L. A. (2019). Turning talk into “rationales”: Using the extended case method for the coding and analysis of semi-structured interview data in ATLAS.ti. BMS Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/ Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 143(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106319852887

  • Weldemariam, K., Boyd, D., Hirst, N., Sageidet, B. M., Browder, J. K., Grogan, L., & Hughes, F. (2017). A critical analysis of concepts associated with sustainability in early childhood curriculum frameworks across five national contexts. International Journal of Early Childhood, 49, 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-017-0202-8

  • Woolf, N. H., & Silver, C. (2017). Qualitative analysis using ATLAS.ti. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181684

  • Zaini, M. F., Sarudin, A., Muhammad, M. M., Osman, Z., Mohamed Redzwan, H. F., & Al-Muhsin, M. A. (2021). House building tips (HBT) corpus dataset as a resource to discover Malay architectural ingenuity and identity. Data in Brief, 36(2), Article 107013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107013