PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

J

• Anderson, C., & Smith, E. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Educators’ handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84–111). Longman.

• Bansiong, A. J. (2023). Direct or inquiry? Science teaching orientations of prospective secondary science teachers. Mountain Journal of Science and Interdisciplinary Research, 83(1), 34-49.

• Boesdorfer, S., & Lorsbach, A. (2014). PCK in action: Examining one chemistry teacher’s practice through the lens of her orientation toward science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2111–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.909959

• Cansiz, N., & Cansiz, M. (2016). Preservice science teachers’ orientations towards teaching science to middle schoolers. Online Submission, 7(3), 69–78.

• Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Skjold, B. A., Muğaloğlu, E. Z., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of science teaching tests: Formative assessments of science teaching orientations. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2265–2288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.918672

• Dahar, M. A., & Faize, F. A. (2011a). Effect of the availability and the use of instructional material on academic performance of students in Punjab (Pakistan). Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 11, 6–18.

• Dahar, M. A., & Faize, F. A. (2011b). Effect of the availability and the use of science laboratories on academic achievement of students in Punjab (Pakistan). European Journal of Scientific Research, 51(2), 193–202.

• Dahar, M. A., Dahar, R. A., Iqbal, M. Z., & Faize, F. A. (2010). Impact of the per pupil expenditures on academic achievement of students at the secondary stage in Punjab (Pakistan). International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 52(52), 122–133.

• Dahar, M. A., Dahar, R.T., Dahar, R. A., & Faize, F. A. (2011). Impact of the prior school environment on academic achievement of students at the secondary stage in Punjab (Pakistan). European Journal of Social Sciences, 19(1), 106-113.

• Faize, F. A., & Akhtar, M. (2020). Addressing environmental knowledge and attitude in undergraduate students through scientific argumentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119928

• Faize, F. A. (2011). Problem and prospect of science education at secondary level in Pakistan [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. International Islamic University.

• Faize, F. A. (2015). Introducing argumentation at higher education in Pakistan-A new paradigm of teaching ethic-based topics. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 8-13.

• Faize, F. A. (2022). Assessing science teachers’ understanding about the nature of scientific inquiry and its reflection in students’ responses using the VASI questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education, 44(14), 2224-2240 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2116959

• Faize, F. A., Akhtar, M., & Hamayun, M. (2024). Developing persuasive writing skills through scientific argumentation using a time-series design. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 42(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.543991

• Faize, F. A., Idress, S., & Sohail, M. (2023). Assessing mental health literacy in Pakistani youth using case-vignettes. Mental Health Review Journal, 28(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-05-2022-0028

• Feyzioğlu, E. Y. (2015). Pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical orientations of science inquiry continuum. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(11), 1–36.

• Feyzioğlu, E. Y., Feyzioğlu, B., & Demirci, N. (2016). Aktif doğrudan veya yapilandirilmiş buluş: fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin fen öğretimi yönelimlerinin belirlenmesi [Active direct or structured discovery: Determining science teachers’ science teaching orientations]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(39), 150–173. https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.49128

• Friedrichsen, P., & Dana, T. M. (2005). A substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers’ science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20046

• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2003). Using a card-sorting task to elicit and clarify science-teaching orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000009551.37237.b3

• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive‐level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers’ science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20046

• Güven, D., Mugaloglu, E. Z., Dogança-Küçük, Z., & Cobern, W. W. (2019). Teaching orientations of freshman pre-service science teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.4

• Khwaja, T., Zafar, A. M., & Faize, F. A. (2022). Accidental leaders: Experiences and perspectives of higher education leaders in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 10(2), 168–194. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.8440

• Listiani, L., Cobern, W. W., & Pleasants, B. A. (2019). An Indonesian translation and adaptation of the POSTT: A science teacher pedagogical orientation, formative assessment device. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(3), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.231

• Listiani, L., & Adhani, A. (2023). Profiling the preservice biology teachers’ teaching orientations: Challenges of 21st century learning. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 77-88.

• Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187009

• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4

• Mavuru, L., & Ramnarain, U. (2018). Relationship between teaching context and teachers’ orientations to science teaching. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8), Article em1564. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91910

• Nargund‐Joshi, V., Rogers, M. A. P., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Exploring Indian secondary teachers’ orientations and practice for teaching science in an era of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20429

• Ramnarain, U., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientations of South African physical sciences teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9395-5

• Renee’S, S., Schuster, D., Cobern, W., Applegate, B., Titrek, O., & Iskender, M. (2010). Assessing teachers’ orientations toward inquiry science teaching: Instrument development and international collaboration. In G. Cakmakci & M. F. Taşar (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: Learning and assessment (pp. 235–246). ESERA.

• Revathi, S., & John, S. (2019). Learning preferences transformation in tertiary education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2S), 215-220.

• Sahingoz, S. (2017). An investigation of Turkish middle school science teachers’ pedagogical orientations towards direct and inquiry instructional approaches [Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/36262c9303af4f79dfd2cdcfe6c5ff2b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

• Sahingoz, S., & Cobern, W. W. (2020). Science methods course influence on pedagogical orientations of pre-service science teachers. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.236.7

• Thornburgh, W., & Brown, S. (2023). Measuring pre-service elementary teachers’ changes in pedagogical orientation towards science teaching. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching & Learning, 19, 104-118.

• Zafar, A., Zafar, M. A., Faize, F. A., & Ahmad, R. H. (2022). Understanding teacher identity and perceptions of action research as a professional development tool in Pakistan. Journal of Education, 204(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574221106753

• Zaman, A., Niwaz, A., Faize, F. A., Dahar, M. A., & Alamgir. (2010). Analysis of multiple-choice items and the effect of items’ sequencing on difficulty level in the test of mathematics. European Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 61–67.