PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

 

e-ISSN 2231-8534
ISSN 0128-7702

Home / Regular Issue / JSSH Vol. 32 (3) Sep. 2024 / JSSH-8919-2023

 

Assessing Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Livestock Production: A Case Study from Shaanxi, China

Yujie Li, Ee Shiang Lim and Ghee-Thean Lim

Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, Volume 32, Issue 3, September 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.3.17

Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), inefficiency, livestock industry, technical efficiency, Tobit regression  

Published on: 27 September 2024

The demand for livestock products is rising, and China is actively encouraging farmers to increase their livestock production to meet this growing demand. At Shaanxi Province’s livestock industry’s current production output and growth rate, it appears unfeasible to meet the government’s production target for 2025. Inefficiencies within livestock production can significantly impede the development of this industry. Therefore, this research employs the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique, considering Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) and Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) assumptions, to assess the technical efficiency of the livestock industry in Shaanxi Province. The data utilised are secondary data from 2010 to 2019. The findings reveal that the Shaanxi livestock industry has an average technical efficiency of 0.84 (CRS) and 0.92 (VRS), suggesting that there is room for further production growth with the current inputs, breeding scales and technology. Although dairy cows, cattle and goats have achieved full technical efficiency. Technical and scale inefficiencies still exist in hog and layer farming practices, which can be improved to increase production. Notably, hog farming demonstrated the lowest technical efficiency, scoring 0.68. The results of factors affecting inefficiency suggest that increasing spending on disease prevention and raising the selling price can both improve technical efficiency. Additionally, reducing death loss has the potential to improve technical efficiency. Thus, the government is expected to promote farm consolidation and expansion while actively advocating for establishing livestock production cooperatives.

  • Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5

  • AskCI Consulting. (2022, January 22). China’s meat imports analysis 2021. AskCI. https://www.askci.com/news/data/maoyi/20220124/0843371733022.shtml

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. E. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

  • Cadell, C. (2020, November 15). China’s sweeping COVID controls put frozen food importers on ice. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-frozenfood-idUSKBN27T0YK

  • Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.

  • Crop Farming Management Office of Shaanxi Province. (2022). Interpretation of the development plan for fruit, vegetable, and tea industries. Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Shaanxi Province. http://nynct.shaanxi.gov.cn/www/bm7831/20221206/9811351.html

  • Dogan, N., Kaygisiz, F., & Altinel, A. (2018). Technical and economic efficiency of laying hen farms in Konya, Turkey. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 20(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0649

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2021). World food and agriculture statistical yearbook 2021. https://www.fao.org/policy-support/tools-and-publications/resources-details/zh/c/1458575/

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2022a). FAOSTAT-Crop and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2022b). Trade of agricultural commodities 2005–2021. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/75eaf30a-b1b0-4e7b-8e21-d8970ff5833b/content#:~:text=The%20share%20of%20agricultural%20products,to%207.9%20percent%20in%202021.

  • Färe, R., & Lovell, C. a. K. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(1), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series a (General), 120(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

  • Fraser, I., & Cordina, D. (1999). An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia. Agricultural Systems, 59(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-521x(99)00009-8

  • Galluzzo, N. (2019). An analysis of technical efficiency in Icelandic dairy and sheep farms. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 121(3), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1916

  • Greene, W. H. (1994). Econometric analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(428), 1567–1569. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291031

  • Hansson, H., & Öhlmér, B. (2008). The effect of operational managerial practices on economic, technical and allocative efficiency at Swedish dairy farms. Livestock Science, 118(1–2), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.01.013

  • Heshmati, A., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Hjalmarsson, L. (1995). Efficiency of the Swedish pork industry: A farm level study using rotating panel data 1976–1988. European Journal of Operational Research, 80(3), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00135-y

  • İkikat, T. E., Ağır, H., & Aydoğan, İ. (2020). Evaluating technical efficiency of hair goat farms in Turkey: The case of Mersin Province. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52(6), 3707–3712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02407-2

  • Jo, H., Nasrullah, M., Jiang, B., Li, X., & Bao, J. (2021). A survey of broiler farmers’ perceptions of animal welfare and their technical efficiency: A case study in Northeast China. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 25(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2021.1912605

  • Kuhn, L., Baležentis, T., Hou, L., & Wang, D. (2020). Technical and environmental efficiency of livestock farms in China: A slacks-based DEA approach. China Economic Review, 62, Article 101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.08.009

  • Lansink, A. O., & Reinhard, S. (2004). Investigating technical efficiency and potential technological change in Dutch pig farming. Agricultural Systems, 79(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-521x(03)00091-x

  • Liu, W., Shankar, S., & Li, L. (2021). Is specialization a strategy to improve farm efficiency in Northwest China? Review of Development Economics, 25(3), 1695–1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12782

  • Luik-Lindsaar, H., Põldaru, R., & Roots, J. (2019). Estonian dairy farms’ technical efficiency and factors predicting it. Agronomy Research, 17(2), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.15159/ar.19.067

  • Meeusen, W., & Van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525757

  • Mohd Idris, N. D., Chamhuri, S., & Talib, B. (2013). Determinants of technical efficiency on pineapple farming. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2013.426.432

  • Mugera, A. W., & Featherstone, A. M. (2008). Backyard hog production efficiency: Evidence from the Philippines. Asian Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8381.2008.00278.x

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2010). China statistical yearbook 2010. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2010/indexeh.htm

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2021). China statistical yearbook 2021. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2021/indexeh.htm

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2023). Statistical communiqué of the People’s Republic of China on the 2022 national economic and social development. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202302/t20230227_1918979.html

  • Patton, D. (2022, February 11). China targets 15% increase in meat output by 2025. Nasdaq. https://www.zawya.com/en/business/china-targets-15-increase-in-meat-output-by-2025-hwsq83x2

  • Price Department of the National Development and Reform Commission (2019). Compilation of national agricultural product cost and benefit data-2019. China Statistics Press. https://www.stats.gov.cn/zs/tjwh/tjkw/tjzl/202302/t20230215_1907941.html

  • Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Thijssen, G. (1999). Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: An application to Dutch dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244449

  • Shaanxi Government. (2008). Special plan for key areas of rural economic development during the 10th Five-Year plan for national economic and social development in Shaanxi province. http://www.shaanxi.gov.cn/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/ghxx/swgh/zxgh_2451/200801/t20080101_1661543.html

  • Shaanxi Government. (2022). Modern fruit industry development plan for the 14th Five-Year plan in Shaanxi province. http://www.shaanxi.gov.cn/xw/ldx/bm/202210/t20221027_2257223_wap.html

  • Shaanxi Provincial Department of Agriculture. (2018). Modern agriculture development plan for the 13th Five-Year plan in Shaanxi province (2016-2020). http://nynct.shaanxi.gov.cn/jgw/home/index/detail/catId/738/articleId/5200.html

  • Shaanxi Provincial Department of Agriculture. (2022). Shaanxi Provincial Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs on the issuance of the “14th Five-Year plan” for the development of animal husbandry and veterinary medicine in Shaanxi province. http://nynct.shaanxi.gov.cn/www/snynctwj/20220428/9792947.html

  • Shaanxi Statistics Bureau. (2015). Transformation of agricultural development mode and enhancement of product supply capacity. http://tjj.shaanxi.gov.cn/sy/ztzl/zgcyksx/201510/t20151019_1615133.html

  • Sharma, K. R., Leung, P., & Zaleski, H. M. (1997). Productive efficiency of the swine industry in Hawaii: Stochastic frontier vs. Data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007744327504

  • Shi, Z. Z., Wang, M. L., & Hu, X. D. (2015). A study on beef market partial equilibrium model in China. Journal of China Agricultural University, 20, 278–290.

  • Siafakas, S., Tsiplakou, E., Kotsarinis, M., Tsiboukas, K., & Zervas, G. (2019). Identification of efficient dairy farms in Greece based on home grown feedstuffs, using the Data Envelopment Analysis method. Livestock Science, 222, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.008

  • Soh, N. C., Samsuddin, N. S., Ismail, M. R., & Habibullah, M. S. (2021). Technical efficiency of commercial stingless bee honey production in Peninsular Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.2.03

  • Somwaru, A., Zhang, X., & Tuan, F. C. (2003). China’s hog production structure and efficiency [Paper Presentation]. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting 2003, Montreal, Canada. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.22003

  • Terry, S. A., Basarab, J. A., Guan, L. L., & McAllister, T. A. (2021). Strategies to improve the efficiency of beef cattle production. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 101(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0022

  • Tian, X., Sun, F., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Technical efficiency and its determinants in China’s hog production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(6), 1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(14)60989-8

  • Wang, G., Zhao, C., Shen, Y., & Yin, N. (2021). Estimation of cost efficiency of fattening pigs, sows, and piglets using SFA approach analysis: Evidence from China. PLOS ONE, 16(12), Article e0261240. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261240

  • Wang, Y., Han, Y., Han, Y., & Li, W. (2021b). Does the grassland ecological compensation policy improve the herders’ breeding technical efficiency in China? Based on the parallel mediation effect model. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0249990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249990

  • Xiao, H., Wang, J., Oxley, L., & Ma, H. (2012). The evolution of hog production and potential sources for future growth in China. Food Policy, 37(4), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.002

  • Yan, Z., Wang, M., Li, X., & Jiang, H. (2023). Impact of African swine fever epidemic on the cost intensity of pork production in China. Agriculture, 13(2), Article 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020497

  • Yang, C. C., Hsiao, C. K., & Yu, M. M. (2008). Technical efficiency and impact of environmental regulations in farrow-to-finish swine production in Taiwan. Agricultural Economics, 39(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00314.x

  • Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, F., Yang, H., Yuan, Y., & Yuan, X. (2017). Economic efficiency of small-scale tilapia farms in Guangxi, China. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 21(2), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2016.1180644

  • Zhong, S., Li, J., Chen, X., & Wen, H. (2021). Research on the green total factor productivity of laying hens in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 315, Article 128150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128150

  • Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., Tian, X., Geng, X., Zhang, P., & Yan, B. (2015). Technical and environmental efficiency of hog production in China – A stochastic frontier production function analysis. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(6), 1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(14)60990-4

  • Zhu, J. (2009). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85982-8