PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

Despite rich research into lexical bundle use in documented writing on both expert and novice levels, little is known about this linguistic behaviour in undergraduate timed argumentative writing. This study aimed to narrow this gap by examining two self-compiled corpora: a student corpus composed of 200 timed argumentative essays written by first-year students at a Vietnamese university and an expert corpus comprising 200 essays of the same type produced by IELTS professional writers. Employing existing bundle classification frameworks, it compared structures and functions of four-word bundles across the corpora. Results showed that bundle use was more clausal than phrasal in both corpora, inconsistent with a few previous studies. In addition, the student corpus outnumbered the reference corpus in all broad structural categories, which can be ascribed to the over-manipulation of the “Pronoun/NP + be/VP fragment”, “NP with of-phrase fragment”, and “PP with of-phrase fragment” constructions. Function-wise, the ubiquity of stance and discourse organising bundles in both the corpora reflected the nature of argumentation, on the one hand, and the rigidly structured IELTS writing format, on the other. The study concluded with methodological implications for bundle research and pedagogical implications for L2 writing.

• Adel, A., & Erman, B. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004

• Akbulut, F. D. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of lexical bundles usage in native and non-native academic writing. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 16(3), 1146-1166. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803583

• Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (version 3.4.3) [Computer software]. Laurence Anthony’s Website. http://www.laurenceanthony.net

• Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003

• Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2003). Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the Lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 71-92). Peter Lang.

• Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371

• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.

• Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899

• Bychkovska, T., & Lee, J. J. (2017). At the same time: Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 university student argumentative writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.008

• Chen, Y. H. (2009). Investigating lexical bundles across learner writing development. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Lancaster University.

• Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 30-49. https://doi.org/10125/44213

• Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P. (2016). Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 849-880. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu065

• Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001

• Cortes, V. (2008). A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish. Corpora, 3, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000063

• Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00007-0

• De Cock, S. (1998). A recurrent word combination approach to the study of formulae in the speech of native and non-native speakers of English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.3.1.04dec

• Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29-62. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29

• Esfandiari, R., & Barbary, F. (2017). A contrastive corpus-driven study of lexical bundles between English writers and Persian writers in psychology research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 29, 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.09.002

• Fajri, M. S. A., Kirana, A. W., & Putri, C. I. K. (2020). Lexical bundles of L1 and L2 English professional scholars: A contrastive corpus-driven study on applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Language and Education, 6(4), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.11271

• Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 75-93). Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838267-11

• Granger, S. (2013). A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 3-33). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6.04gra

• Granger, S. (2018). Formulaic sequences in learner corpora: Collocations and lexical bundles. In A. Siyanova-Chanturia & A. Pellicer-Sanchez (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 228-247). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315206615-13

• Granger, S., & Rayson, P. (1998). Automatic profiling of learner texts. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 119-131). Addison Wesley Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315841342-9

• Huang, K. (2015). More does not mean better: Frequency and accuracy analysis of lexical bundles in Chinese EFL learners’ essay writing. System, 53, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.011

• Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54

• Hyland, K. (2008a). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x

• Hyland, K. (2008b). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001

• Johns, A. (1995). Teaching classroom and authentic genres: Initiating students into academic cultures and discourses. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 277-291). Ablex.

• Kennedy, C., & Thorp, D. (2007). A corpus investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS academic writing task. In L. Taylor & P. Falvey (Eds.), IELTS collected paper: Research in speaking and writing assessment (pp. 316-378). Cambridge University Press.

• Lu, X., & Deng, J. (2019). With the rapid development: A contrastive analysis of lexical bundles in dissertation abstracts by Chinese and L1 English doctoral students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.008

• Nam, D., & Park, K. (2020). I will write about: Investigating multiword expressions in prospective students’ argumentative writing. PLoS ONE, 15(12), Article e0242843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242853

• Pan, F., Reppen, R., & Biber, D. (2016). Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.003

• Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000098

• Petch-Tyson, S. (1998). Writer/reader visibility in EFL written discourse. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 107-118). Addison Wesley Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315841342-8

• Ping, P. (2009). A study on the use of four-word lexical bundles in argumentative essays by Chinese English-majors: A comparative study based on WECCL and LOCNESS. Teaching English in China, 32, 25-45.

• Poos, D., & Simpson, R. (2002). Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: Some findings form the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 3-23). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.03poo

• Shin, Y. K., Cortes, V., & Yoo, I. W. (2018). Using lexical bundles as a tool to analyze definite article use in L2 academic writing: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.004

• Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.

• Skelton, J. (1988). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT Journal, 42(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.1.37

• Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & McClair, A. (2013). Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.05.002

• Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(4), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.017

• Stubbs, M. (2007a). An example of frequent English phraseology: Distribution, structures and functions. In R. Facchinetti (Ed.), Corpus linguistics 25 years on (pp. 89-105). Radopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204347_007

• Stubbs, M. (2007b). Quantitative data on multi-word sequences in English: The case of word ‘world’. In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs, & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 163-189). Continuum.

• Svartvik, J. (1990). The London-Lund corpus of spoken English: Description and research. Lund University Press.

• Wei, L., & Ying, H. (2011). On the role of formulaic sequences in second language acquisition. US-China Foreign Language, 9(11), 708-713.

• Wei, Y., & Lei, L. (2011). Lexical bundles in academic writing of advanced Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 42, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211407295

• Wood, D. (2002). Formulaic language in acquisition and production: Implications for teaching. TESL Canada Journal, 20(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v20i1.935

• Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication, 20(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4