Developing system thinking skills among secondary school students has been set as an educational goal for years. The emerging properties of a system have recently been influenced by the characteristics of each student. Thus, this study examines the Big Five personality traits as predictors of Malaysian school students‘ systems thinking. Quantitative data was obtained using a standardized questionnaire with established scales (the Goldberg’ International Personality Item Pool and the Systems Thinking Scale) from 196 upper secondary school students. The results indicate that personality traits affect secondary students‘ system thinking, and almost thirty percent of the variation in the Malaysian system thinking skill can be elucidated by its sub-domains. Although agreeableness has superior impacts on systems thinking, extraversion seems to have less importance on their systems thinking. The results also reveal the negative association between extraversion and neuroticism and systems thinking. We conclude that certain personality traits can improve systems thinking and promote students’ ability to solve complex problems. The implications of these findings for the enhancement of systems thinking among school students are discussed.

• Abdullah, I., Omar, R., & Panatik, S. A. (2016). A literature review on personality, creativity and innovative behavior. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1S), 177–182.

• Ahrari, S., Samah, B. A., Hassan, M. S. H. B., Wahat, N. W. A., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2016). Deepening critical thinking skills through civic engagement in Malaysian higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.009

• Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44(2015), 669–678. doi: 0.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050

• Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2017). A complete set of systems thinking skills. Insight, 20(3), 9–17. doi: 10.1002/inst.12159

• Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560. doi: 10.1002/tea.20061

• Balkis, M., & Isiker, G. B. (2005). The relationship between thinking styles and personality types. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(3), 283–294. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2005.33.3.283

• Barlow, D. H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Carl, J. R., Bullis, J. R., & Ellard, K. K. (2014). The nature, diagnosis, and treatment of neuroticism: Back to the future. Clinical Psychological Science, 2(3), 344–365. doi: 10.1177/2167702613505532

• Behl, D. V., & Ferreira, S. (2014). Systems thinking: An analysis of key factors and relationships. Procedia Computer Science, 36, 104–109. doi: 0.1016/j.procs.2014.09.045

• Buffinton, K. W., Jablokow, K. W., & Martin, K. A. (2002). Project team dynamics and cognitive style. Engineering Management Journal, 14(3), 25–33. doi: 10.1080/10429247.2002.1141517

• Burnell, D. (2016). Systems thinking orientation assessment framework (STOAF): Towards identifying the key characteristics of the systems thinker and understanding their prevalence in the layperson. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(3), 471–482. doi: 10.1002/sres.2347

• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd Ed.). Routledge.

• Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 287, 112934. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934

• Carvalho, L. de F., Pianowski, G., & Gonçalves, A. P. (2020). Personality differences and COVID-19: Are extroversion and conscientiousness personality traits associated with engagement with containment measures? Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 42(2), 179-184. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2020-0029

• Chatterji, M. (2003). Designing and using tools for educational assessment. Allyn & Bacon.

• Chien, P. L. K., & Lajium, D. A. D. (2016). The effectiveness of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) learning approach among secondary school students. International Conference on Education and Psychology 2016 (ICEduPsy16), 95–104.

• Clancy, S. M., & Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: I. Identity status and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3(3), 227–245. doi: 10.1207/s15327795jra0303_

• Dachner, A. M., & Polin, B. (2016). A systematic approach to educating the emerging adult learner in undergraduate management courses. Journal of Management Education, 40(2), 121–151. doi: 10.1177/1052562915613589

• David, R. A., & Reich, L. M. (2005). The creation and evaluation of a systems-based practice/managed care curriculum in a primary care internal medicine residency program. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 72(5), 296–269.

• Davidz, H. L., & Nightingale, D. J. (2008). Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers. Systems Engineering, 11(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1002/sys.20081

• Dragoni, L., Oh, I. S., Vankatwyk, P., & Tesluk, P. E. (2011). Developing executive leaders: The relative contribution of cognitive ability, personality, and the accumulation of work experience in predicting strategic thinking competency. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 829–864. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01229.x

• Fadda, D., & Scalas, L. F. (2016). Neuroticism as a moderator of direct and mediated relationships between introversion-extraversion and well-being. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 49–67. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i1.985

• Fraser, J., Fahlman, D. W., Arscott, J., & Guillot, I. (2018). Pilot testing for feasibility in a study of student retention and attrition in online undergraduate programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 260-278. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3326

• Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th Ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007

• Hassan, S. A., & Ghazali, R. (2012). Quick tips fast track conducting quantitative research. Quty Researcher. doi: 10.4135/9781529727098

• Hiep, N. H., & Ameen, A. A. (2017). Changing the administrative thinking and leadership to reform SOEs (State-Owned Enterprises) in Vietnam. International Journal on Recent Trends in Business and Tourism, 1(2), 1–9.

• Hitchins, D. K. (2003). Advanced systems thinking, engineering, and management. Artech House.

• Hossain, N. U. I., Dayarathna, V. L., Nagahi, M., & Jaradat, R. (2020). Systems thinking: A review and bibliometric analysis. Systems, 8(3), 1–26. doi: 10.3390/systems8030023

• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118

• Ismail, A. A., Sulaiman, T., & Roslan, S. (2020). Models of relationship between emotional, spiritual, physical and social intelligence, resilience and burnout among high school teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1A), 1-7. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081301

• Jerome, C., Lee, J. A. C., & Ting, S. H. (2017). What students really need: Instructional strategies that enhance higher order thinking skills (hots) among UNIMAS undergraduates. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(S4), 661–668.

• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th Ed.). Guilford Press.

• Lavi, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2019). Systems thinking of pre-and in-service science and engineering teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 248–279. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1548788

• Lawrence, J. M., Hossain, N. U. I., Nagahi, M., & Jaradat, R. (2019, October 23-25). Impact of a cloud-based applied supply chain network simulation tool on developing systems thinking skills of undergraduate students. [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Toronto, Canada.

• Lewis, G. J., Dickie, D. A., Cox, S. R., Karama, S., Evans, A. C., Starr, J. M., Bastin, M. E., Wardlaw, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2018). Widespread associations between trait conscientiousness and thickness of brain cortical regions. Neuroimage, 176, 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.033

• Linder, N., & Frakes, J. (2011). A new path to understanding systems thinking. The Systems Thinker, 1, 1–7.

• Lukaszewski, A. (2019). Evolutionary perspectives on the mechanistic underpinnings of personality. In J. Rauthmann (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 1-39). Elsevier.

• Malmqvist, J., Hellberg, K., Möllås, G., Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2019). Conducting the pilot study: A neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–11. doi: 10.117/1609406919878341

• Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsa Green Publication.

• Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025: Preschool to post-secondary education. Ministry of Education.

• Mobus, G. E. (2018). Teaching systems thinking to general education students. Ecological Modelling, 373, 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.1.013

• Moore, S. M., Komton, V., Adegbite-Adeniyi, C., Dolansky, M. A., Hardin, H. K., & Borawski, E. A. (2018). Development of the systems thinking scale for adolescent behavior change. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 40(3), 375–387.

• Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11–35. doi: 10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00041-

• Nagahi, M., Jaradat, R., Goerger, S. R., Hamilton, M., Buchanan, R. K., Abutabenjeh, S., & Ma, J. (2020). The impact of practitioners’ personality traits on their level of systems-thinking skills preferences. Engineering Management Journal, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/10429247.2020.1780817

• OECD. (2019). Programme for international students assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_MYS.pdf

• Onik, M. F. A., Fielt, E., & Gable, G. G. (2017). Towards a complex adaptive systems roadmap for information systems research. In ling, S C, Bahri, S, & Finnegan, P (Eds.) Proceedings of the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2017 (pp. 1-14). Association for Information Systems (AIS). http://aisel.aisnet.org/

• O’Sullivan, M. K., & Dallas, K. B. (2017). A collaborative approach to implementing 21st century skills in a high school senior research class. Education Libraries, 33(1), 3–9. doi: 10.26443/el.v33i1.284

• Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127

• Palmberg, I., Hofman-Bergholm, M., Jeronen, E., & Yli-Panula, E. (2017). Systems thinking for understanding sustainability? Nordic student teachers’ views on the relationship between species identification, biodiversity and sustainable development. Education Sciences, 7(3), 1–18. doi: 10.3390/educsci7030072

• Pan, X., Valerdi, R., & Kang, R. (2013). Systems thinking: A comparison between Chinese and Western approaches. CSER, 16, 1027–1035. doi: 10.1016j.procs.2013.01.108

• Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G., & Bardi, A. (2015). Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1177/1088868314538548

• Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2013). On the prediction of academic performance with personality traits: A replication study. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 778–781. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.003

• Peters, D. H. (2014). The application of systems thinking in health: Why use systems thinking? Health Research Policy and Systems, 12(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-51

• Preise, R., Biggs, R., De Vos, A., & Folke, C. (2018). Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: Organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 46–53. doi: 10.5751/es-10558-230446

• Provasnik, S., Malley, L., Stephens, M., Landeros, K., Perkins, R., & Tang, J. H. (2016). Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSS advanced 2015: Mathematics and science achievement of US students in grades 4 and 8 and in advanced courses at the end of high school in an international context. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

• Rammel, C., Stagl, S., & Wilfing, H. (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems—A co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.014

• Randle, J. M., & Stroink, M. L. (2018). The development and initial validation of the paradigm of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(6), 645–657. doi: 10.1002/sres.250

• Raved, L., & Yarden, A. (2014). Developing seventh grade students’ systems thinking skills in the context of the human circulatory system. Frontiers in Public Health, 2, 1–11. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00260

• Sabouripour, F., Hassan, C. N., & Roslan, S. (2017). Predictors of resilience among Iranian graduate students in University Putra Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7, 996–1011. doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i14/3756

• Sammut-Bonnici, T. (2015). Complex adaptive systems. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 12, 1–3. doi: 10.1002/9781118785317.weom120209

• Schretlen, D. J., van der Hulst, E.-J., Pearlson, G. D., & Gordon, B. (2010). A neuropsychological study of personality: Trait openness in relation to intelligence, fluency, and executive functioning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(10), 1068–1073. doi: 10.1080/13803391003689770

• Schwaba, T., Luhmann, M., Denissen, J. J., Chung, J. M., & Bleidorn, W. (2018). Openness to experience and culture-openness transactions across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 118–136. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/u7tb2

• Singh, S. A., & Masuku, B. M. (2014). Assumption and testing of normality for statistical analysis. American Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 3(1), 169–175.

• Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Vidovic, V., Saklofske, D. H., Stoeber, J., & Benoit, A. (2019). Perfectionism and the five-factor model of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 367–390.

• Smolova, L. V. (2019). Systematic thinking as a factor in implementing sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho & A. Consorte McCrea (Eds.), Sustainability and the humanities (pp. 443–454). Springer.

• Tackett, J. L., & Lahey, B. B. (2017). Neuroticism. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 39–56). Oxford University Press.

• Verhoeff, R. P., Knippels, M. C. P., Gilissen, M. G., & Boersma, K. T. (2018). The theoretical nature of systems thinking. Perspectives on systems thinking in biology education. Frontiers in Education, 3, 1–11. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00040

• Wang, S., & Wang, H. (2011). Teaching higher order thinking in the introductory MIS course: A model-directed approach. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 208–213. doi: 10.1080/08832323.2010.505254

• World Bank. (2020). World Bank country and lending groups. World Bank. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.

• Wright, A. G. (2017). Factor analytic support for the five-factor model. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 217–242). Oxford University Press.

• Zufferey, P., Caspar, F., & Kramer, U. (2019). The role of interactional agreeableness in responsive treatments for patients with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 33(5), 691–706. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_37