PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

This article critically reviews the development of painting art and the engineering of bridges in the first half of the 20th century. It shows that the expression of thought is directed towards innovation at a certain historical moment and non-imitation as a professional ethos. The vision is articulated through a multilevel perspective, including the social shaping of technology. The different milestones are chronologically compared following the Artistic Vanguards. It is shown that there was an accumulation of radical, disruptive innovation in the period between the World Wars. New tools to develop creativity were sought, and new figurative solutions and materials, such as concrete for bridge construction, began to be employed. The impressionist Monet and Eiffel and the cubist Picasso and Ribera deeply comprehended the previous techniques and dared to challenge them. The transversality of art and engineering is key to the innovation process.

• Addis, B. (1994). The art of the structural engineer. Artemis.

• Allimant, R. D. (2009). Tiempo y cosa: La influencia de Einstein en el pensamiento de Zubiri en torno al tiempo lineal [Time and thing: Einstein’s influence on Zubiri’s thinking on linear time]. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica, 65, 809-832.

• Arenas, J. J. (1990). El sentido del diseño en ingeniería [The meaning of engineering design]. Revista de Obras Pública, 3294, 11-17.

• Arenas, J. J. (2002). Caminos en el aire: Los puentes [Paths in the air: Bridges]. Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos.

• Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press.

• Ballantyne, A. (2004). Architectures: Modernism and after. Blackwell Publishing.

• Billington, D. P. (1985). The tower and the bridge. The new art of structural engineering. Princeton University Press.

• Billington, D. P. (2003). The art of structural design. A Swiss legacy (pp. 431-433). Yale University Press.

• Billington, D. P. (2006). Teaching ethics in engineering education through historical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0021-z

• Borja-Villel, M. (n.d.). Exhibition encounters with the 30s. Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madrid, Spain.

• Boutang, Y. M. (2011). Cognitive capitalism. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611407207

• Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 43-53.

• Calvo-Sotelo, L. (2003). Una reflexión sobre la ingeniería y los ingenieros. [A reflection on engineering and engineers]. https://www.raing.es/discursoingreso/una-reflexion-sobre-la-ingenieria-y-los-ingenieros-al-empezar-el-siglo-xxi/

• Cappelli, P. (1999). The new deal at work. Harvard Business School Press.

• Carra, A. (2009). Algunas objeciones a Bauhaus [Some objections to the Bauhaus]. Paperback, 6, 1-11.

• Coupérie-Eiffel, P. (2012). Eiffel por Eiffel [Eiffel by Eiffel]. Plataforma Editorial.

• Crotty, M. (2012). The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203127353

• Daix, P. (2002). Historia cultural del arte moderno [Cultural history of modern art]. Ediciones Cátedra.

• Dempsey, A. (2002). Estilos, escuelas y movimientos [Styles, schools and movements]. Editorial Blume.

• Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. Perigee.

• Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (2021). The world of goods. Routledge.

• Drucker, P. F. (2021). The age of discontinuity. Guidelines to our changing society. Heinemann.

• Einstein, A. (1979). Ideas and opinions. Rupa & Co.

• Fernández-Troyano, L. (1999). Tierra sobre el agua. Visión histórica universal de los puentes [Land over water. Universal historical overview of bridges]. Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos.

• Fernández, S. G., Kubus, R., & Pérez-Iñigo, J. M. (2019). Innovation ecosystems in the EU: Policy evolution and horizon Europe proposal case study (the Actors’ perspective). Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(17), 4735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174735

• Forgács, É. (1997). The Bauhaus idea and Bauhaus politics. Central European University Press.

• Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical change and economic theory (pp. 33-66). Pinter.

• Gasset, O. y. (1983). Mapa-sinopsis de su vida y obra [Map-synopsis of his life and work]. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.

• Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681-696.

• Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495-510.

• Godard, T. (1924). Ponts er combles métalliques [Metal bridges and decks] . Société des ingénieurs civils de France et de la Société d’encouragement por l’industrie nationale.

• Goethe, J. W. (2002). Goethe y la ciencia. Siruela.

• Graw, I. (2014). ¿Cuánto vale el arte? Mercado, especulación y cultura de la celebridad [How much is art worth? Market, speculation and celebrity culture]. Mardulce.

• Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science Technology and Human Values, 27, 28-52.

• Kondratieff, N. D. (1935). The long waves in economic life. The Review of Economic Statistics, XVII, 105-115.

• Kuhn, T. (2017). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.

• Kumar, A. (2021). Between metis and techne: Politics, possibilities and limits of improvisation. Social & Cultural Geography, 22(6), 783-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1645201

• Laiglesia, J. F. de, Loeck, J., & Martín, R. C. (Eds.). (2010). La cultura transversal. Colaboraciones entre arte, ciencia y tecnología [Transversal culture. Collaborations between art, science and technology]. Universidad de Vigo.

• Lanza, C. (2007). El sentimiento del puente en la pintura moderna. Merodeando en torno a un cuadro no muy conocido de Paul Klee [The feeling of the bridge in modern painting. Lurking around a little-known painting by Paul Klee]. Revista de Obras Públicas, 3473, 37-50.

• Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. The M.I.T Press.

• Manterola, J. (2010). La obra de ingeniería como obra de arte [The engineering work as a work of art]. Fundación Arquitectura y Sociedad Laetoli.

• Milicua, J. (1994). Historia universal del arte- Arte s-XX-VV-IX [Universal history of art- Arte s-XX-VV-IX]. Editorial Planeta.

• Mulgan, G. (2018). Big mind. How collective intelligence can change our world. Princeton University Press.

• Perrow, M. R., & Davy, A. J. (2008). Handbook of ecological restoration: Principles of restoration (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

• Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 1, 14, 399-441.

• Potts, J. (2009). Art and innovation: An evolutionary view of the creative industries. Innovation Management, Policy & Practice, 11, 138-147.

• Preckler, A. M. (2003). Historia del arte universal de los siglos XIX y XX [History of universal art of the 19th and 20th centuries]. Editorial Complutense.

• Rice, P. (1994). An engineer imagines. Ellipsis.

• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. Human Choice and Climate Change, 2, 327-399.

• Rosado-García, M. J. (2022). When engineering is art: The meaningful value. Revista Ingeniería de Construcción, 37(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.7764/ric.00026.21

• Rosado-García, M. J., Kubus, R., Argüelles-bustillo, R., & García-García, M. J. (2021). A new European Bauhaus for a culture of transversality and sustainability. Sustainability, 11844, 1-22. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.3390/su132111844

• Ruiz, C. (2010). Salvador Dalí y la ciencia, más allá de una simple curiosidad [Salvador Dalí and science, beyond mere curiosity]. Pasaje a La Ciencia, 13, 1-13.

• Sanz-Balduz, L. J. (2004). The structural grail. Revista de Obras Públicas, 3444, 35-48.

• Schlaich, J. (2001, September 2-5). Variety in bridge design. 4th Symposium on Strait Crossing, Bergen, Norway.

• Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung [Theory of economic development]. Duncker & Humblot.

• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/27.1.96

• Torroja, E. (2010). Razón y Ser de los tipos estructurales [Reason and being of the structural types]. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.

• VV.AA. (2001). Diccionarios Oxford-complutense: Arte del Siglo XX [Oxford-complutense dictionaries: 20th century art]. Editorial Complutense.

• Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 18, 362-378.