Home / Regular Issue / JSSH Vol. 29 (4) Dec. 2021 / JSSH-8247-2021


Cost-Utility Analysis of Malaysian Elderlies Living in Public Long-Term Care Institutions

Syazreen Niza Shair and Thomas Sachi Purcal

Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, Volume 29, Issue 4, December 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.16

Keywords: Cost-utility analysis, EQ5D, long term care, population ageing, quality-adjusted-life-years

Published on: 13 December 2021

This research compares the quality of life of Malaysian elderlies living in public formal long-term care institutions, including residential care and nursing home care. It provides evidence of the cost-effectiveness of both programs. The sample of Malaysian elderlies aged 60 years and above was collected from the World Health Survey, including five dimensions of health status: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each of the dimensions has three levels, including 1 (“no problems”), 2 (“some problems”) and 3 (“major problem”). The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of elderlies living in both institutions are estimated using a generic health-related measurement method, EQ-5D. In addition, cost-utility analysis is adopted to compare the effectiveness of programs in allocating resources. The QALY of those living in nursing home care is reasonably lower than those in residential care due to their worse chronic health conditions. The majority are categorised as severely disabled. The cost-effectiveness evaluation of each public long-term care model suggests that the residential care program is cost-effective, with the cost per QALY being MYR22 945. At the same time, a nursing home for disabled people is not effective as the cost per QALY is MYR57 822, falls outside the willingness to pay (WTP) range between (MYR 19,929–MYR 28,470).

  • Ambigga, K. S., Ramli, A. S., Suthahar, A., Tauhid, N., Clearihan, L., & Browing, C. (2011). Bridging the gap in ageing: Translating policies into practice in Malaysian primary care. Asia Pacific Family Medicine 10(2), 1-7. https:/doi.org/10.1186/1447-056X-10-2

  • Bernama. (2012, October 16). Hampir 6,000 warga emas huni rumah orang tua seluruh negara [Nearly 6,000 senior citizens live in aged care homes across the country]. The Borneo Post. https://www.theborneopost.com/2012/10/16/hampir-6000-warga-emas-huni-rumah-orang-tua-seluruh-negara/

  • Bulamu, N. B., Kaambwa, B., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015). A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 179-201. https:/doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0372-8

  • Dahlan, A., Nicole, M., & Maciver, D. (2010). Elements of life satisfaction amongst elderly people living in institutions in Malaysia: A mixed methodology approach. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(2), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-18611170006-7

  • Dimana silapnya warga emas [Where is the mistake of senior citizens]. (2012). Hargaemas MY. http://www.hargaemas.com.my/terkini/dimana-silapnya-warga-emas/

  • Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press.

  • EuroQol. (2019). EQ-5D-5L User Guide 2019. https://euroqol.org/publications/user-guides.

  • Forsyth, D. R., & Chia, Y. C. (2009). How should Malaysia respond to its ageing society? Medical Journal Malaysia, 64(1), 46-50.

  • Goh, Z. Y., & Lai, M. M. (2013). The formal and informal long-term caregiving for the elderly: the Malaysian experience. Asian Social Science, 9(4), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n4p174

  • Kiik, S. M., & Nuwa, M. S. (2020). Quality of life of the elderly: A comparison between community-dwelling elderly and social welfare institutions. Medisains, 18(1), 9-13. http://doi.org/10.30595/medisains.v18i1.6940

  • Kumar, P. B. A., Udyar, S. E., Arun, D., Sai, S. (2016). Quality of life of elderly people in institutional and non-institutional setting: A cross-sectional comparative study. National Journal of Community Medicine, 7(7), 546-550.

  • Li, P. L., & Khan, T. H. (2012). Designing long term care accommodation for senior citizens: The need for a design code in Malaysia. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 8(1), 45-56.

  • Lim, Y. W., Shafie, A. A., Chua, G. N., & Hassali, M. A. A. (2017). Determination of cost-effectiveness threshold for health care interventions in Malaysia. Value in Health, 20(8), 1131-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.002

  • Mafauzy, M. (2000). The problems and challenges of the ageing population of Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 7(1), 1-3.

  • Makai, P., Brouwer, W. B., & Koopmanschap, M. A. (2014). Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 102, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.050

  • Mohd Tobi, S. U., Fathi, M. S., & Amaratunga, D. (2017). Ageing in place, an overview for the elderly in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1891(1), Article 02010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005434

  • Nikmat, A. W., Hawthorne, G., & Al-Mashoor, H. (2011). Quality of life in dementia patients: nursing home versus home care. International Psychogeriatrics, 23(10), 1692-1700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610211001050

  • Shafie, A. A., Lim, Y. W., Chua, G. N., Azmi, M., & Hassali, A. (2014). Exploring the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year in the state of Penang, Malaysia. Clinico Economics and Outcomes Research, 6, 473-481. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S67375

  • Shiroiwa, T., Igarashi, A., Fukuda, T., & Ikeda, S. (2013). WTP for a QALY and health states: More money for severer health states? Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 11, 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-22

  • Su, S. W., & Wang, D. (2019). Health-related quality of life and related factors among elderly persons under different aged care models in Guangzhou, China: A cross-sectional study. Quality of Life Research, 28,1293-1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02107-x

  • The EuroQol Group. (1990), EuroQol-A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9

  • Vitorino, L. M., Paskulin, L. M. G., & Vianna, L. A. C. (2013). Quality of life of seniors living in the community and in long term care facilities: A comparative study. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 21(Spec), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692013000700002

  • Warga Emas. (2021, August 12). Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat. https://www.jkm.gov.my/jkm/index.php?r=portal/submenu&id=UkQ5T2ZCTlVkeWFYU2pJZGM5QlE5UT09

  • World Health Survey. (2012). World Health Survey, Malaysia. The World Health Survey. World Health Organisation. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/

  • Yusof, F., Goh, A., & Azmi, S. (2012). Estimating an EQ-5D value set for Malaysia using time trade off and visual analogue scale method. Value in Health, 15, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.024

ISSN 0128-7702

e-ISSN 2231-8534

Article ID


Download Full Article PDF

Share this article

Recent Articles