Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
Pertanika Journal Home Facebook
Pertanika · Universiti Putra Malaysia Press

Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities

Official journal of Universiti Putra Malaysia for scholarly work across the social sciences, humanities and related interdisciplinary fields.

e-ISSN 2231-8534 ISSN 0128-7702
Browse latest issue Author guidelines Submit Here
Research article

Conceptualization of Kindness among Adolescents of Pakistan

Khansa, Shazia Khalid and Fahad Riaz Choudhry

Volume 29, Issue 4 December 2021 Published 13 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.32
Keywords Adolescents, enabling factors, in-depth interviews, inhibiting factors, kindness, recipients
Article content

Abstract

Kindness, a basic element of morality, has been observed to have a greater impact on individuals’ general well-being, societal development, and integration of humanity. However, despite its phenomenal acceptance in all religions and cultures worldwide, the concept remained understudied. Therefore, qualitative research was planned to explore the phenomenon of kindness, its enabling factors, inhibiting factors, and to identify the recipients of kindness in Pakistani adolescents. An interview guide was developed in Study 1 through two Focus Group Discussions with eight girls and eight boys of 18 and 19 years to achieve the objectives. The interpretative phenomenological analysis method developed seven questions for the interview guide and then finalized through committee approach and pilot testing. In the main study, in-depth interviews were conducted on a total sample of 14 adolescents. Among which 50% were girls between 18 and 19 years (M= 18.5, SD= 0.51). The data were collected from Rawalpindi and Islamabad using a convenient sampling technique and analyzed through thematic framework analysis. The results suggested that Pakistani adolescents conceptualized kindness as benefitting oneself and others with goodness and withholding harm. Religion and socialization were reported as the prime enabling factors for being kind. In addition, the availability of resources and the perception of the recipient’s deservedness also determined kindness. Among the inhibitory factors, self-detaining tendencies, family and peer pressure, and non-availability of resources emerged. It is hoped that the present study may enhance the understanding of kindness for future research.
Supporting literature

References

  1. Ahmed, Z. S., & Khan, Z. (2016). Direct and indirect impacts of terrorism on youth in Pakistan. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 53(1), 235-249.
  2. Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The ‘other-praising’emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650519
  3. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt.
  4. Bader, G., & Rossi, C. (1998). Focus groups: A step-by-step guide. The Bader Group.
  5. Baldwin, C. P., & Baldwin, A. L. (1970). Children’s judgments of kindness. Child Development, 41(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127387
  6. Baskerville, K., Johnson, K., Monk-Turner, E., Slone, Q., Standley, H., Stansbury, S., Williams, M., & Young, J. (2000). Reactions to random acts of kindness. The Social Science Journal, 37, 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(00)00062-8
  7. Binfet, J. T., & Gaertner, A. (2015). Children’s conceptualizations of kindness at school. Canadian Children, 40(3), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs.v40i3.15167
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Bryan, W. V. (2015). The professional helper: The fundamentals of being a helping professional. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
  10. Canter, D., Youngs, D., & Yaneva, M. (2017). Towards a measure of kindness: An exploration of a neglected interpersonal trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.019
  11. Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481
  12. Cleary, M., & Horsfall, J. (2016). Kindness and its relevance to everyday life: Some considerations for mental health nurses. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 37(3), 206-208. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2016.1140546
  13. Comunian, A. L. (1998). The kindness scale. Psychological Reports, 83(3), 1351-1361. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3f.1351
  14. Crosnoe, R., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). Research on adolescence in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150008
  15. Davey, A., & Eggebeen, D. J. (1998). Patterns of intergenerational exchange and mental health. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53(2), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/53B.2.P86
  16. Davidsen, A. S. (2013). Phenomenological approaches in psychology and health sciences. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10(3), 318-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.608466
  17. DiSalvo, D. (2009). Forget survival of the fittest: It is kindness that counts. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/forget-survival-of-the-fittest/
  18. Exline, J. J., Lisan, A. M., & Lisan, E. R. (2012). Reflecting on acts of kindness toward the self: Emotions, generosity, and the role of social norms. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.626790
  19. Flood R. L., & Carson E. R. (1993). Dealing with complexity: An introduction to the theory and application of systems science (2nd ed.). Plenum Press.
  20. Frank, D. (2010, May 5). Can babies tell right from wrong? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/video/magazine/1247467772000/can-babies-tell-right-from-wrong.html
  21. Goodwin, G. L. (2011, May 9). Kindness: The core of 12 religions. Inspire Me Today. https://inspiremetoday.com/blog/kindness-the-core-of-12-religions/
  22. Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. Handbook of effective sciences, 11, 852-870. Oxford University Press.
  23. Index Mundi. (2018). Pakistan Demographics Profile 2018. Index Mundi. https://www.indexmundi.com/pakistan/demographics_profile.html
  24. Jacob, S. A., & Ferguson, S. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(42), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1718
  25. Kohn, A. (1990). Effects of rewards on prosocial behavior. Cooperative Learning, 10(3), 23.
  26. Kvale, S. (1989). To validate is to question. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Issues of validity in qualitative research (pp. 73-92). Studentlitteratur.
  27. Leahy, R. L. (1979). Development of conceptions of prosocial behavior: Information affecting rewards given for altruism and kindness. Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.15.1.34
  28. Lewis, J., & Ritchie, J. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications.
  29. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111
  30. McGarry, L. J. (1986). Kindness and human nature: thoughts on the high cost of negativeness. Villanova University Press.
  31. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
  32. Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
  33. Otake, K., Shimai, S., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Otsui, K., & Fredrickson, B. I. (2006). Happy people become happier through kindness: A counting kindnesses intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 361-375. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-3650-z
  34. Pagel, M. (2012). Wired for culture: The natural history of human cooperation. Penguin UK.
  35. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
  36. Phillips, A., & Taylor, B. (2009). On kindness. Hamish Hamilton Press.
  37. Pollock, L. A. (2011). The practice of kindness in early modern elite society. Past and Present, 211(1), 121-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtq056
  38. Rich, G. J. (2003). The positive psychology of youth and adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021017421413
  39. Rowland, L. (2018). Kindness: Society’s golden chain.The Psychologist, 31, 30-34.
  40. Rutherford, E., & Mussen, P. (1968). Generosity in nursery school boys. Child Development, 755-765. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126981
  41. Schnall, S., & Roper, J. (2012). Elevation puts moral values into action. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 373-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611423595
  42. Stewart, D., & Shamdasani, P. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  43. Strenta, A., & Dejong, W. (1981). The effect of a prosocial label on helping behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 142-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033711.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .