The intersubjective demographic strategies of modern families and settlements appear to be nonlinear, negatively affecting traditional solutions’ efficiency in spurring demographic growth. This study seeks to determine how external circumstances influenced the formation and changes of fundamental collective ideas. The authors present the results from a model of demographic strategies that analyzed 1,544 rural settlements in Central Russia from 1959 to 1989, which was a period of accelerated urbanization and demographic transition. A fractal model was used to reconstruct social intentions. Control factors for each settlement were estimated based on indicators that reflect rural settlements’ material and technical conditions, economic, medical, and social service development levels, and the availability of attractive migration goals. More archaic communities responded to natural growth stimulation in a linear and relatively predictable fashion, but new competencies, needs, and opportunities appeared as communities developed socially and economically. Many counterintuitive effects influenced the evolution of modernized communities. In particular, the migration aspirations of rural youth led to a postponement in births and a drop in the birth rate despite an increased quality of life. An intense migratory influx into hub settlements also contributed to a decrease in the birth rate among the local population.

• Ackoff, R. L., & Emery, F. E. (1972). On purposeful systems: An interdisciplinary analysis of individual and social behavior as a system of purposeful events. Aldine-Atherton.

• Alekseev, V. V., Borodkin, L. I., Korotaev, A. V., Malinetskii, G. G., Podlazov, A. V., Malkov, S. Y., & Turchin, P. V. (2007). Mezhdunarodnaja konferencija “Matematicheskoe modelirovanie istoricheskih processov” [International conference ‘Mathematical modeling of historical processes’]. Vestnik Rossijskogo fonda fundamental’nyh issledovanij, (6), 37-47. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17906233

• Avrech, A. L. (2015). Hrushhev i Tambovshhina. Podrobnaja istorija kukuruzofikacii Tambovskoj oblasti (Tom 2) [Khrushchev and Tambov: A detailed history of cornification in the Tambov region (Vol. 2)]. Chesnokov Publishing House.

• Axelrod, R. (2007). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In J.-P. Rennard (Ed.), Handbook of research on nature inspired computing for economics and management (pp. 90-100). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-984-7.ch007

• Borodkin, L. I. (2005). Metodologija analiza neustojchivyh sostojanij v politiko-istoricheskih processah [Methods of complexity science in political history studies]. Mezhdunarodnye Processy, 3(7), 4-16. http://www.intertrends.ru/system/Doc/ArticlePdf/127/Borodkin-07.pdf

• Borodkin, L. I. (2016). Modelirovanie istoricheskih processov: Ot rekonstrukcii real’nosti k analizu al’ternativ [Modeling of historical processes: From the reconstruction of reality to the analysis of alternatives]. Aletheia.

• Borodkin, L. I. (2019). Vyzovy nestabil’nosti: Koncepcii sinergetiki v izuchenii istoricheskogo razvitija Rossii [Challenges of instability: Synergetic concepts in the study of the historical development of Russia]. Ural’skij Istoricheskij Vestnik, (2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2019-2(63)-127-136

• Bykova, V. I., & Schukin, Y. K. (2004). Medicinskaja pomoshh’ v Tambovskoj oblasti: spravochnik [Medical service in the Tambov region: A reference book]. PS.

• Kamensky V. I. (Ed.). (1989). Sel’skie naselennye punkty Tambovskoj oblasti po dannym Vsesojuznoj perepisi naselenija 1989 g. Statisticheskij sbornik [Rural settlements of the Tambov region according to the 1989 all-union population census: Statistical collection]. TOSU.

• Kanishchev, V. V. (2016). Demograficheskij perehod v rossijskom agrarnom obshhestve vtoroj poloviny XIX – pervoj treti XX v. Sovremennye metody issledovanija [The demographic transition in the Russian agricultural society of the late 19th – the first third of the 20th century: Modern research methods]. Ezhegodnik po agrarnoj istorii Vostochnoj Evropy, (1), 210-223. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29791445

• Malinetskii, G. G. (2013). Chudo samoorganizovannoj kritichnosti [The miracle of self-organized criticality]. In P. Bak (Auth.), Kak rabotaet priroda: eorija samoorganizovannoj kritichnosti (pp. 13-56). URSS.

• Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The Fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman and Company.

• Marshall, A. (1890). 1920. Principles of economics. Mac-Millan.

• Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems, A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

• Morgan, D. H. J. (1989). Strategies and sociologists: A comment on crow. Sociology, 23(1), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038589023001003

• Muravyov, N. V. (1988). Iz istorii vozniknovenija i razvitija obshheobrazovatel’nyh shkol Tambovskoj oblasti [From the history of the emergence and development of secondary schools in the Tambov region]. Central Black Soil Publishing House.

• Peña, F. M., & Azpilicueta, M. P. E. (2003). Existen estrategias demográficas colectivas? Algunas reflexiones basadas en el modelo demográfico de baja presión de la Navarra cantábrica en los siglos XVIII y XIX [Are there collective demographic strategies? Some reflections based on the demographic model of decompression in Cantabrian Navarre, 18th and 19th centuries.]. Revista de Demografía Histórica, 21(2), 13-58. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=857540

• Pertsev, V. A. (2013). Material’noe polozhenie naselenija RSFSR (vtoraja polovina 1950-h – 1980-e gg.) [The material situation of the population of the RSFSR (the latter half of the 1950s–1980s)]. VSU.

• Piskunov, S. A. (2017). Gosudarstvennaja politika sel’skohozjajstvennogo pereselenija i ee realizacija na territorii RSFSR (2-ja polovina 1940 – 1980-e gg.) [State policy for agricultural resettlement and its implementation on the territory of the RSFSR (the latter half of the 1940s–1980s); Doctoral dissertation]. Tambov State University. https://dlib.rsl.ru/01009439303

• Polyakov, Y. A. (Ed.). (2011). Naselenie Rossii v XX veke: Istoricheskie ocherki, 1980–1990 [The population of Russia in the XX century: Historical essays, 1980–1990]. ROSSPEN.

• Protasov, L. G. (Ed.). (2004). Tambovskaja jenciklopedija [Tambov encyclopaedia]. Yulis.

• Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260090203

• Sackmann, R. (2015). How do societies cope with complex demographic challenges? A model. In R. Sackmann, W. Bartl, B. Jonda, K. Kopycka & C. Rademacher (Eds.), Coping with demographic change: A comparative view on education and local government in Germany and Poland (pp. 25-57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10301-3_3

• Smorgunov, L. V. (2012). Slozhnost’ v politike: nekotorye metodologicheskie napravlenija issledovanij [Complexity in politics: Some methodological directions of research]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, (4), 90-101. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18377548

• Verbitskaya, O. M. (2009). Rossijskaja sel’skaja sem’ja v 1897-1959 gg.: istoriko-demograficheskij aspekt [A Russian rural family in 1897–1959: Historical and demographic aspects]. Grif & K.

• Zhiromskaya, V. B., & Isupov V. A. (Eds.). (2005). Naselenie Rossii v XX veke: Istoricheskie ocherki, 1960–1979 [The population of Russia in the XX century: Historical essays, 1960–1979]. ROSSPEN.

• Zhukov, D. S., & Kanishchev, V. V. (2019). “Esli by ne bylo vojny”: modelirovanie demograficheskih processov v rossijskoj derevne 1930-1950-h godov (po materialam Tambovskoj oblasti) [‘If there was no war’: Modeling the demographic processes in Russian agrarian society in the 1930s–1950s (on the Tambov region material)]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istorija, (3), 118-136. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41238592

• Zhukov, D. S., & Lyamin, S. K. (2016). The modeling of institutional modernization by means of fractal geometry. SAGE Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016640858

• Zhukov, D. S., Kanishchev, V. V., & Lyamin, S. K. (2011). Fraktal’noe modelirovanie istoriko-demograficheskih processov [Fractal modeling of historical and demographic processes]. Ineternum. http://ineternum.ru/mono1/

• Zhukov, D. S., Kanishchev, V. V., & Lyamin, S. K. (2012). Fraktal’noe modelirovanie demograficheskih processov v rossijskom agrarnom sociume (1926–1939 gg.) [Fractal modeling of demographic processes in the Russian agricultural society (1926–1939)]. Fractal Simulation, (1), 33-60. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18338705

• Zhukov, D. S., Kanishchev, V. V., & Lyamin, S. K. (2013). Fractal modeling of historical demographic processes. Historical Social Research, 38(2), 271-287. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24145486

• Zhukov, D. S., Lyamin, S. K., & Barabash, N. S. (2017). Non-linear effects of turbulent institutional modernization. Jahrbücher Für Geschichte Osteuropas, 65(4), 624-650. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44646091

• Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), 137-150.

• Coey, C. (2018). International researcher mobility and knowledge transfer in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 162(2), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2017.1401918

• Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix. University – industry – government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183

• Hayden, M., McIntosh, S., Sandoval-Hernández, A., & Thompson, J. (2020). Global citizenship: Changing student perceptions through an international curriculum. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(5), 589-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1816158

• Huang, Q. (2020). The pandemic and the transformation of liberal international order. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 26(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09698-0

• Jeder, D. (2014). Transdisciplinarity – the advantage of a holistic approach to life. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 137(3), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.264

• Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2019). Conceptualizing ‘Everyday Resistance’: A transdisciplinary approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150154

• Knight, J. (2018). Learner agency in online task-based language learning for spoken interaction. [Doctor dissertation, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya]. https://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/664231#page=1

• Krestovska, N., Romandze, L., & Barabash, T. (2017). Mediation in Ukraine: Law regulation. Law Journal of Ukraine, 9(1129), 13-14.

• Lohr, K. (2018). Conflict Prevention and Management (CPM) system in transdisciplinary research collaborations: Potential and constraints [Doctor dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/20087/dissertation_loehr_katharina.pdf?sequence=5

• Mitchell, S., Cordell, D., & Fam, D. (2015). Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research. Futures, 65(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.007

• Mokiy, V. (2017). The methodology of transdisciplinarity-4. Nalchik.

• Narovska, K. (Ed.). (2019). Basic rules of the development of professional skills of mediators (Report). http://namu.com.ua/ua/downloads/osnovni_zasady_NBNM/NAMU%20Mediation%20Basic%20Training%20-%20Recommendations%202019.pdf

• Parravicini, A. (2019). Pragmatism and emergentism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1623

• Scholz, R. (2020). Transdisciplinarity: Science for and with society in light of the university’s roles and functions. Sustainability Science, 15(1), 1033-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00794-x

• Simkova, I., & Saienko, N. (2019). The impact of transdisciplinarity on sight translation training in scientific and technical domains. Advanced Education, 11(3), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.164697

• Stepanova, O., Polk, M., & Saldert, H. (2020). Understanding mechanisms of conflict resolution beyond collaboration: An interdisciplinary typology of knowledge types and their integration in practice. Sustainability Science, 15(1), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00690-z

• Tang, K.-P. (2015). Communicative action and the trans-disciplinary education in Taiwan. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 6(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.22545/2015/00069

• Tsang, K. (2012). The use of midpoint on Likert scale: The implications for educational research. Hong Kong Teachers Centre Journal, 11(1), 121-130.

• Tuliakova, K. (2020). Methodology of the teaching of English professional spoken production to future specialists in the field of mediation and conflict resolution [Doctoral dissertation, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute]. http://scc.univ.kiev.ua/abstracts_db/?PAGEN_1=3

• United Nations. (2018). United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation. (2018). https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXII-4&chapter=22&clang=_en