PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Rice husk is a typical solid waste generated during rice processing, typically disposed of by combustion or landfills. One promising method for repurposing rice husk ash is as a pozzolan in geopolymer foam. This study explores additives like hydrogen peroxide and sodium alcohol ether sulfate (SAES) to enhance the properties of porous geopolymer foam made from rice husk ash. Hydrogen peroxide is utilized as a foaming agent to enhance porosity, while SAES acts as a stabilizer to influence the structure of the foam. The foam was prepared by mixing sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, rice husk ash, genioperl, hydrogen peroxide, and stabilizer in specific ratios. Two variables are hydrogen peroxide (0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 wt.%) and SAES (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 wt.%). The compressive strength and total porosity tests are conducted according to standards. The results show that increased hydrogen peroxide increased total porosity but decreased compressive strength. On the other hand, SAES improved the foam’s structural integrity and maintained the compressive strength without significantly increasing porosity at 1.0 wt.% concentrations. The optimal total porosity and compressive strength were achieved with 0.40 wt.% hydrogen peroxide and 1.0 wt.% SAES. This study contributes to agriculture science and technology by exploring the potential use of rice husk ash-based geopolymer foam and determining the optimum formulation for its production. The findings also suggest that this foam can be utilized in various agricultural applications such as buildings, pipelines, and agriculture fields.

• Amran, M., Huang, S. S., Debbarma, S., & Rashid, R. S. (2022). Fire resistance of geopolymer concrete: A critical review. Construction and Building Materials, 324, Article 126722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126722
  
  Bai, T., Song, Z. G., Wu, Y. G., Hu, X. D., & Bai, H. (2018). Influence of steel slag on the mechanical properties and curing time of metakaolin geopolymer. Ceramics International, 44(13), 15706-15713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.243
  
  Bhuyan, M., Kurtulus, C., Heponiemi, A., & Luukkonen, T. (2023). Peracetic acid as a novel blowing agent in the direct foaming of alkali-activated materials. Applied Clay Science, 231, Article 106727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2022.106727
  
  Celik, A., Yilmaz, K., Canpolat, O., Al-Mashhadani, M. M., Aygörmez, Y., & Uysal, M. (2018). High-temperature behavior and mechanical characteristics of boron waste additive metakaolin based geopolymer composites reinforced with synthetic fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 187, 1190-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.062
  
  Coman, V., Teleky, B. E., Mitrea, L., Martău, G. A., Szabo, K., Călinoiu, L. F., & Vodnar, D. C. (2020). Bioactive potential of fruit and vegetable wastes. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, 91, 157-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2019.07.001
  
  Dizaji, H. B., Zeng, T., Hölzig, H., Bauer, J., Klöß, G., & Enke, D. (2022). Ash transformation mechanism during combustion of rice husk and rice straw. Fuel, 307, Article 121768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121768
  
  Fatehi, H., Ong, D. E., Yu, J., & Chang, I. (2021). Biopolymers as green binders for soil improvement in geotechnical applications: A review. Geosciences, 11(7), Article 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070291
  
  Funk, J. E., & Dinger, D. R. (2013). Predictive process control of crowded particulate suspensions: Applied to ceramic manufacturing. Springer.
  
  Haller, T., Beuntner, N., & Thienel, K. C. (2024). Optimized building envelope: Lightweight concrete with integrated steel framework. Materials, 17(), Article 1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061278
  
  Hassan, A., Arif, M., Shariq, M., Alomayri, T., & Pereira, S. (2023). Fire resistance characteristics of geopolymer concrete for environmental sustainability: A review of thermal, mechanical and microstructure properties. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(9), 8975-9010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02495-0
  
  Jampala, P., Tadikamalla, S., Preethi, M., Ramanujam, S., & Uppuluri, K. B. (2017). Concurrent production of cellulase and xylanase from Trichoderma reesei NCIM 1186: Enhancement of production by desirability-based multi-objective method. 3 Biotech, 7(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0607-y
  
  Ji, Z., Li, M., Su, L., & Pei, Y. (2020). Porosity, mechanical strength and structure of waste-based geopolymer foams by different stabilizing agents. Construction and Building Materials, 258, Article 119555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119555
  
  Komnitsas, K., & Zaharaki, D. (2007). Geopolymerisation: A review and prospects for the minerals industry. Minerals Engineering, 20(14), 1261-1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2007.07.011
  
  Kumar, N., Chhokar, R., Meena, R., Kharub, A., Gill, S., Tripathi, S., Gupta, O., Mangrauthia, S., Sundaram, R., & Sawant, C. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in productivity and sustainability of rice cultivation system: a critical review in Indian perspective. Cereal Research Communications, 50, 573–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-021-00214-5
  
  Li, X., Shao, J., Zheng, J., Bai, C., Zhang, X., Qiao, Y., & Colombo, P. (2023). Fabrication and application of porous materials made from coal gangue: A review. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 20(4), 2099-2124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.14359
  
  Negri, C., Ricci, M., Zilio, M., D’Imporzano, G., Qiao, W., Dong, R., & Adani, F. (2020). Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133, Article 110138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110138
  
  Pacho, J. K. M., Florencondia, N., & Aduna, E. J. R. (2024). Evaluating the optical properties of philippine rice hull ash as a potential alternative to calcium carbonate filler for paints. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 7(11), 477-483.
  
  Posuvailo, V., Kovalchuk, I., & Ivasenko, I. (2022). Influence of hydrogen peroxide on the composition and porosity of oxide-ceramic coatings on alloys of the Al–Si–Cu and Al–Cu–Mg systems. Materials Science, 57(6), 894-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-022-00619-5
  
  Ransy, C., Vaz, C., Lombès, A., & Bouillaud, F. (2020). Use of H2O2 to cause oxidative stress, the catalase issue. International journal of molecular sciences, 21(23), Article 9149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239149
  
  Singh, B. (2018). Rice husk ash. In R. Siddique & P. Cachim (Eds.) Waste and supplementary cementitious materials in concrete (pp. 417-460). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102156-9.00013-4
  
  Singh, N. B., & Middendorf, B. (2020). Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 237, Article 117455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117455
  
  Tarek, D., Ahmed, M., Hussein, H. S., Zeyad, A. M., Al-Enizi, A. M., Yousef, A., & Ragab, A. (2022). Building envelope optimization using geopolymer bricks to improve the energy efficiency of residential buildings in hot arid regions. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, Article e01657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01657
  
  Yan, D., Shi, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Qian, H., Chen, S., Liu, Y., & Ruan, S. (2024). A comparative study of porous geopolymers synthesized by pre-foaming and H2O2 foaming methods: Strength and pore structure characteristics. Ceramics International, 50(10), 17807-17817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.02.270
  
  Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Li, X., Tian, D., Ma, M., & Wang, T. (2022). Optimized pore structure and high permeability of metakaolin/fly-ash-based geopolymer foams from Al–and H2O2–sodium oleate foaming systems. Ceramics International, 48(13), 18348-18360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.094
  
  Zhao, J., Trindade, A. C. C., Liebscher, M., de Andrade Silva, F., & Mechtcherine, V. (2023). A review of the role of elevated temperatures on the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced geopolymer (FRG) composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 137, Article 104885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104885